Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
What you should do is to take *two* self driving Teslas, and program them to try…
ytc_UgxU_jO3W…
G
I agree with this 100%, as an AI Dev. And I am sorry that there are people that …
ytr_UgwaKU6kW…
G
chatgpt has gotten so much worse. its wrong and represents things as fact all th…
ytc_UgxDSFzEp…
G
The whole reason this was even allowed to happen was because the AI was given mo…
ytc_UgzRAy-Wb…
G
Hey, option D is the correct answer.
The contest is over and winners have been …
ytr_Ugwm31mk0…
G
It's so AI and robots can take over their jobs,the more I see these videos the m…
ytc_UgxvkE3gu…
G
Please slow down the progress of AI . Well , the rule makers can pass a law to a…
ytc_UgwHt9p1I…
G
We ARE made in the image of God. We also have a history of creating “idols”. Ai …
ytc_Ugw6PE_qU…
Comment
I mean, if we can unite the effort of poisoning the reference pool of the AI. So if the entire pool is successfully poisoned, then there is little to no way to recover from the poison, because there is no ground truth to rely on for the AI to compare the poisoned data with, which makes what the AI thinks is "normal" become poisoned. Even with a separate validation set, if the validation set is derived from the poisoned set, then the validation set is also poisoned, rendering it ineffective in detecting poisoned data. If the statistics are what the AI works on, then you just mess up the statistics. Make the "poison" become "normal" for AI, and nothing could work.
I mean, you can kidnap, like, millions of people and force them to handpick clean data in a sweaty old warehouse somewhere, but that would be unfeasible, right?
youtube
Viral AI Reaction
2025-04-12T05:5…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | unclear |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgzqvZ0XsNAP7NjMy2V4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyW9v9apCBoJc_vCaV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzacE3WvYxkLI9O_-R4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyKQcP3JqzStWztgRZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxPfZ3bPvqq9P7Ramx4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwBzTciH-CYKE3bcjF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxxUrY2MdXwR2MFmiZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyUvjopVx4jV4kHw_R4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxizd5LdBTY1p0y2xp4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzP4SpJWrdeeCmFUJ14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}
]