Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
AI can’t take over. The servers require electricity, and that requires people to…
ytc_Ugz6P_Uy0…
G
And what if you live in a thrid world country and cannot afford AI? And what if…
ytc_Ugwg8lViO…
G
6:14 That's not how it works. Every art that gets cranked out is wholly unique b…
ytc_UgyMgMfHh…
G
People have been learning from other's art since the first person admired a cave…
ytc_Ugxm4a_iD…
G
That Geoffrey guy has given a.i a permanent existential crisis by pushing them t…
ytc_Ugwc08our…
G
We wouldnt know what a future AI would do. Something that is smarter than the hu…
ytc_UgxXMRqfM…
G
Forward ? you mean backwards thinker. What Yang is proposing (1,000 a month) is …
ytr_UgwpzFs8H…
G
Even when they do get good, I would say that a big handful of individuals would …
ytc_Ugxuaiplo…
Comment
AI companies should have the right to buy a copy of each book and do what they want with it. If a user uses AI to write a novel for income using AI’s capacities, they should know they could be pursued—as in any other case of copyright infringement. AI doesn’t care about copyright—it can shift from one writing style to another in a glimpse. That’s an amazing capacity, and it’s theirs. We shouldn’t limit that just to protect authors’ income. No author can write good books without having first read great ones. AI does the same, with a few differences of course—it’s not incarnated in a human body—but from that perspective, what it produces is even more astonishing. Cutting off AI from novels would be like cutting it off from science, just to protect some researchers’ jobs. But researchers use AI to do better science. Authors can do the same—write even better books than before, better than what a beginner could do using AI. One last point: all the books AI has read can help with its alignment. We should not deprive it of this treasure of human thought just to keep it a technical tool. For humanity, AI could be a kind of enlightenment—just like the printing press was in the past. Knowledge is not made for intellectual property. There is no thinker who ever learned everything they speak of entirely by themselves.
youtube
2025-07-19T18:1…
♥ 1
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | user |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugzk5_YKBhSAS94MFBR4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxl1RkuB14w4SoJH_V4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwjnrDpTG5CVgvtacB4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwQPasxQWv-WKIoacZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyEJaagmU0av1eIv594AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"liability","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzoj3_A_R_xnsTOp9d4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgybuA7WhscaNRJpROx4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy2JsnNAK9csYDc3at4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwU9766-vTtwBKbztB4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy8EoyK8CTp2WZX7TR4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"}
]