Raw LLM Responses

This is a bad take. Andy Warhol's most famous piece is a simple picture of himself duplicated in multiple colors. It's simple beyond belief. Should it then not be copyrighted? It sure doesn't meet this made up qualification of art having to be hard to make. What then of Pollock's famous splatters on a canvas. Similarly, the ability to trace became a thing in about the 17th century and there are renowned artists 'accused' of having used that technique. Meanwhile most artists I know today will trace to some degree. That's how far back tools increasing the accessibility of art degrading its artistic value goes. I'm sure older people in the art sphere will remember how digital art was devalued when it first became a thing, due to how much easier it is to make art digitally. AI is similarly just a tool. You can look up AI prompts guides and see the kind of hoops you have to jump through if you want the kind of specificity you need to get your precise artistic vision. That's what this dude did along with using photoshop to fix issues and merge portions from different renderings. If I put paint in shotgun shells and the fired successively at a canvas, cutting out parts I didn't like and such and such, nobody would dispute it was art, even though no artistic skill other than vision and perseverance were involved. Because art is 100% about VISION.