Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G Right now my work is talking about integrating an AI that will let users create … ytr_UgzI98Das… G Artificial intelligence is a necessity for kids who rely on it when they feel li… ytc_UgxzmL6_g… G Business/ governments strive to lower the costs of production, outsourcing by Ro… ytc_UgxOmXnYL… G Excluding the "Generative AI is theft" argument, which is both wrong AND bad fai… ytc_UgwGbCdGv… G There are AI influencer videos where the black people are doing super stupid and… ytc_UgyF6t16E… G AI won't be dangerous as long as it doesn't develop a self-motivation to do thin… ytc_UgzXVnoQ8… G As always, the problem isn't necessarily the technology itself, it's the idiotic… ytc_Ugw0sYE99… G So I'm the only one who cursed at them out of anger damn it I'm so sorry chatgpt… ytc_Ugxv-R1xU…
Comment
What I find surprisingly lacking in discussions like these is proper representation of social sciences in the panel, be it sociologists, historians, political scientists (etc). If the goal is to talk about AI and technology's impact on our future, and therefore by definition about societies, cultures, people, locally and globally, then I'd expect to see some experts of such fields included into the discussion, because that is their field of expertise, unlike with non-social science experts. It'd be wise to include some computational/IT experts to benefit from their expertise into understanding the technology itself (however so often they seem lacking and ill-advised when it comes to social matters and the technology's impact on peoples and their societies), but it seems wild, nonsensical if not sometimes cynical to me that the other way around social scientists are so very often categorically and systemically excluded on matters that relate to THEIR fields of expertise, while non-experts often talk so confidently on social matters they don't actually have much expertise in.
youtube AI Governance 2026-04-05T12:1…
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitynone
Reasoningcontractualist
Policynone
Emotionmixed
Coded at2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"ytc_UgwZyB8kadifiA5VOKV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyuXF-ZWdfxIGTZpqB4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_UgxaIa4fEwEzdI2s9zd4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugx43kDpw1e7XXqgyMt4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugzj9PJuBEeifooeqFt4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyrdosCanqs7tT0YON4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugy1gpYcngcXLWCMFP94AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_UgwxtRtaQzrEzEbkwAh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_UgzBCZUWleatLTwB9HN4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_UgwtpYsUBVrfpiZnz8N4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"} ]