Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G Did not expect Rob Pike to pop up here, glad he shares my sentiments on AI… ytc_Ugw4HPyJH… G Core moral issue is this - Sentience. In your videos you reference other artwork… ytc_UgxUV4NgK… G Evidently 99% of the people in these comments think we are in the early days of … ytc_UgyYEw4MC… G WE THE PEOPLE WANT THE STRICTEST POSSIBLE REGULATIONS DONE WITH A.I. YOU ELITES … ytc_Ugxpp6Qoh… G yeah I'm on the other end of the spectrum, I told my Chatgpt to refer to itself … rdc_mlhtr61 G I think ai will be not going to take a job of experienced senior but for juniors… ytc_UgwOVg_EC… G So if one robot sees us humans destroying one they learn that humans are a thre… ytc_UgyMbs81v… G I'm so glad most people in this comment section are anti AI. Fuck AI, pick up a … ytc_Ugwu7ibMc…
Comment
What I find surprisingly lacking in discussions like these is proper representation of social sciences in the panel, be it sociologists, historians, political scientists (etc). If the goal is to talk about AI and technology's impact on our future, and therefore by definition about societies, cultures, people, locally and globally, then I'd expect to see some experts of such fields included into the discussion, because that is their field of expertise, unlike with non-social science experts. It'd be wise to include some computational/IT experts to benefit from their expertise into understanding the technology itself (however so often they seem lacking and ill-advised when it comes to social matters and the technology's impact on peoples and their societies), but it seems wild, nonsensical if not sometimes cynical to me that the other way around social scientists are so very often categorically and systemically excluded on matters that relate to THEIR fields of expertise, while non-experts often talk so confidently on social matters they don't actually have much expertise in.
youtube AI Governance 2026-04-05T12:1…
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitynone
Reasoningcontractualist
Policynone
Emotionmixed
Coded at2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"ytc_UgwZyB8kadifiA5VOKV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyuXF-ZWdfxIGTZpqB4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_UgxaIa4fEwEzdI2s9zd4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugx43kDpw1e7XXqgyMt4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugzj9PJuBEeifooeqFt4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyrdosCanqs7tT0YON4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugy1gpYcngcXLWCMFP94AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_UgwxtRtaQzrEzEbkwAh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_UgzBCZUWleatLTwB9HN4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_UgwtpYsUBVrfpiZnz8N4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"} ]