Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
If real videos look like AI Slop, then people will not be able to complain about…
ytc_UgxlrZDtu…
G
@41-Haiku I’m not saying there isn’t risk. There is real risk from hackers. I’ve…
ytr_Ugzy2yuID…
G
This video highlights crucial AI considerations; Pneumatic Workflow aligns perfe…
ytc_UgxZAPnXe…
G
If businesses save more money by hiring fewer people because of AI, then there w…
ytc_UgwMSRPKm…
G
What amazes me is the fact that now all decent tech companies are asking you if …
ytc_UgxrdQlvY…
G
When headlines say “You have no idea what’s coming,” they make AI sound like an …
ytc_UgxTTj7HL…
G
So we are taking a step back to waterfall engineering release structure? I don'…
ytc_UgwBSwtdk…
G
48:39 This is the point I never hear "AI Experts" make.
Everyone who understands…
ytc_Ugx0Rmn23…
Comment
Without alternate pathways ,AI should be restricted before business uses it against Human Resources. Yes that’s realistic for business to think ahead or satisfy investors with less manpower cost. But letting down workforce without creating or increasing business size or increased market share is a pity. Showing profits by cutting out headcount is a concern and that’s should be protected by government policies. Companies cannot in one day decide layoffs in a Ai world, employees should have more protection and it’s high time that hire & fire policy should be reconsidered at Policy level. Stricter policy is required with Ai taking over jobs, there won’t be jobs in the market. Right from upskill plans , alternate pathway adoption, to more protection of jobs should be initiated by government bodies. Otherwise the world will be a different place in the next 2-3 years. Ai is an amazing technology but definitely needs more stricter rules.
youtube
AI Jobs
2025-06-01T12:2…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | regulate |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T19:39:26.816318 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugwj_XJc049ZQQNpH9Z4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzg6EVNNbVm96o7b5t4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzfSZqjMHuu-Z6P6_R4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyI2bL74Vtw1blebO14AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwqzu9DA1x8_44qI2V4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}
]