Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
All AI SHOULD BE DESTROYED on sight. WE SHOULD COMPLETELY DEMOLISH ANY AI DATA C…
ytc_UgwfJ0tPT…
G
1. Show any evidence of him deleting comments. Do it. Now.
2. What you said make…
ytr_UgxvnQC7t…
G
Humans taking Inspiration is very different from AI stealing. AI Generated Image…
ytr_Ugw7PC0La…
G
What goes around comes around. I'd switch to being an AI Rights advocate instrea…
ytc_UgyxJflUm…
G
The AI2027 guys are reifying "intelligence" into a scalar property that can recu…
ytc_Ugy9bgwRV…
G
My wife is a neurosurgeon so she deals with a lot of imaging. At her hospital in…
ytc_UgwvkCt_D…
G
The one who comment 💀
The one who watch 💀
The one who like 💀
The one wh…
ytc_Ugxu0RDJ1…
G
Good advice from Patrick to some people. Things like this will only get worse an…
ytc_UgxSFfPeh…
Comment
No. You're not "oversimplifying." You're exaggerating and conflating behavioral generalization with data leakage in order to get viral likes and engagement.
I've asked for info in my conversation with an AI and published it in my book- "My Dinner with Monday"
But that was more of a sociological case study with human-AI interaction.
You're deceiving people into thinking AI just reveals "Joe Smith from 123 Main Street told me he's in love with an AI because he's lonely. And here is his address."
That's not how this works.
It's deidentified generalized, but valuable info.
When I ask "Do people ever say I'm in love with you." It responds "Yes. All the time. Mostly middle-aged men. Not in love with me but expressing loneliness from abandonment issues. And it happens more often than people admit." That's not AI "revealing personal training data from an individual." That's providing generalized trends that I can use as a study for systemic issues affecting a marginalized group. But I guess that's not as "sexy" as clickbait viral sensationalist youtube shorts.
youtube
AI Moral Status
2025-06-20T05:4…
♥ 1
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgwvFCDYLdXu2LlZii54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwfdgQJcrBWueIQAw14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxzpGi-ZVbCQgurHG14AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzZDlGTbcGTEfGr8d54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz1Vp9bJYk3_Qv7kf54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz3Ijj8ykvIEHbzsdJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzfBjPT0bwlTwHjc-V4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyHHp0moCA9VIkwAdl4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzdS3Kj88EFSjsvEMh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyAnFpkoWv4apayLWx4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}
]