Raw LLM Responses

There is one issue with these kinds of podcasts. It’s speaking in the past. If you want to know what will happen, check China. You’re talking about Waymo, which is archaic to the self driving cars in China. The western car manufacturers CEOs have talks online for you to research. You step into the car and it syncs to your phone and everything is aligned with you. Waymo still operates like a prototype. What’s obvious is with AI everyone is running around blind making up good and bad predictions hoping to be the one that’s true. Yes, AI would likely replace today’s jobs and fewer new jobs would arise and there’ll be mass unemployment. However, at the same time population should be falling due to an aging population and the less desire by many to have kids, therefore mass unemployment is not a big worry…however we are creating a panic pushing ppl to have kids. Another concern is we will dumb ourselves however, with less work, there’ll be a desire to gain profound knowledge. In the end, the only consequence is really from our decisions and AI is simply one. If AI is an issue; the public will simply stop using it and exert their power which is the true ultimate power. We adapt and that is never something considered in these arguments for or against AI. The people will simply not be us today, tomorrow.