Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
@IgnisKhanit's not sentient. How does it roleplay hacking nuclear arsenals or …
ytr_UgzsFSPFi…
G
Are not they afraid ( those technofeudal moguls) that all those fired people (re…
ytc_Ugz0uu6JU…
G
We need to differentiate between "AI" and large language models.
I have no dou…
ytc_Ugx6YnfaH…
G
The AI will be used to kill those who protest against AI taking their jobs.…
rdc_nip5leg
G
One of the best anecdotes to the challenges we face from AI is to prioritize the…
ytc_Ugwt5J72A…
G
Most meat-beings who say “ChatGPT is conscious” are:
• Looking for the AI itsel…
ytc_UgwE7W9ir…
G
As someone with strictly mathematical brain I have to say you just interested me…
ytc_UgxeabTzl…
G
If AI is so intelligent, why not ask AI to come up with all the best solutions f…
ytc_Ugyi3KhQQ…
Comment
As someone who works with neural networks professionally, though admittedly I deal more with linguistic stuff like Large Language Models than image generation, I think the problem isn't the technology itself, it's that right now the technology is stealing from people. What we need is new legislation that codifies that generative machine learning algorithms which rely upon training data must obtain a license from the copyright holder for any data used to train that model. If a license cannot be obtained for any reason other than the work being public domain (or legally not requiring a license for other reasons), that data cannot be used to train that model. It's key though that this specifies generative models - if all you've built is a classifier (that is, all it produces is an analysis of data rather than producing data of the same sort as it was trained on), I think these restrictions would be excessive. It would also be foolish to specify the nature of the algorithm beyond simply being generative or not, since specifying an architecture would make the legislation less future-proof.
youtube
2023-02-09T00:5…
♥ 3
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | regulate |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgzzdRcT_gzyQRObAed4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwdUpL7z_68m4HwJxl4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzkUcNYKk5iHC6qtzV4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz9BiGb7dzlaMFrASt4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwFtOPHjtq79oXOlJ54AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy77YkKAlZMbkeL6uZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwFkKNMrwSICQVS26J4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"regulate","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzabCMj_GlkNRH2w8l4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyClT24tIZO3iiPQjR4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwC0pLkgnmLmCGZHe94AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"}
]