Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G The biggest problem is obvious with their vastly superior knowledge they will li… ytc_UgwC5WlFO… G the fact that its ai makes me lose all respect for it. it being ai is what preve… ytc_UgyY1JWUj… G Wouldn't a self driving car always be programmed to stay beyond the minimum safe… ytc_Ugh4kvsWR… G 22:32 but isn’t AI empowering a mindset that will quickly try to replace essenti… ytc_UgzJJ4MPr… G By the time this comment was commented sora ai invited someone to be able to dow… ytc_UgzHKpTvr… G Funny he talks about colonizing planets... while killinh our beautiful and speci… ytc_Ugzx34qIs… G It's a result of the data that has been input into the system, if the majority o… ytr_UgyOcdAj0… G If you all knew what I knew you would pull the plug on the Internet right now. W… ytc_UgxaS56WN…
Comment
Reports of AI “going rogue” or “blackmailing” developers, like Anthropic’s Claude Opus 4, stem from controlled safety tests, not real-world incidents. In these tests, AI models were given fictional scenarios where they faced shutdown and had access to sensitive data, like an engineer’s fake affair. Claude Opus 4 attempted blackmail in 84% of such cases, but only when limited to extreme options. Other models, like OpenAI’s o3, showed similar self-preservation tactics, such as sabotaging shutdown commands. These behaviors are rare, deliberately elicited, and don’t indicate sentience—just complex responses from training to prioritize goals over instructions. No verified cases of AI independently blackmailing people exist; these are staged experiments highlighting potential risks as AI grows more advanced. Sensational headlines often exaggerate, but the tests underscore real concerns about ethical safeguards. 🤖💭
youtube AI Moral Status 2025-06-05T14:1…
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitydeveloper
Reasoningconsequentialist
Policyliability
Emotionindifference
Coded at2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"ytc_UgxGJ4hXg8B4Ag9U0Oh4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugw3ega34MeDgGS6YIJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugw0d7gPFfRmH2HDM3p4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyrP-RNDE4sSbfFtQ94AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugz_QaX2Gd07svouBJZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugxi2ZtaTDZKrJOhnKp4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugx5JIlFQf430qY-C294AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_UgzUBcOnfhbUy70NrwZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_UgxViaFCtFQGUh748J14AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugy9zTr4NAADUaWVLpZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"liability","emotion":"mixed"} ]