Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
and now the photographers are panicked because AI is nearly replicating the phot…
ytr_UgykcD5ff…
G
The only politician in US with common sense! Governments around the world need t…
ytc_Ugz3GFUfu…
G
We can expect a rise in applications for trade schools. Not like AI can build ho…
ytc_UgzK6WIC3…
G
You can get an AI to admit any factually incorrect statement if you're persistat…
ytr_Ugz3ogy5R…
G
I'm sorry but in what way is this robot hot? The only possible chance this bot h…
ytc_Ugj-Pbakn…
G
I guess I need to preemptively deepfake some alibis, or at least character refer…
rdc_izl3638
G
you have no choice, your future has been chosen for you. Bow to AI, your new mas…
ytc_Ugwgov080…
G
Anyone saying that Ai Won't replFe programmers jobs is coping. It will not repla…
ytc_Ugz_B0PKq…
Comment
This is an "interesting" take, considering that we have now seen the emails from Elon Musk to Sam Altman where he states that OpenAI has a "0" (not 1) percent chance of competing against other big AI players unless Elon is the one in charge of OpenAI, and only under a proposed absorption by Tesla. If Elon were so concerned about continuing OpenAI's non-profit structure only, he wouldn't have taken his toys (money) and run home when they realized that without more funding they would never be able to reach the required compute to realize AGI in the first place, nor would he have proposed that OpenAI fall under control of the for-profit company named Tesla. Now that Elon realizes he made a big mistake by leaving OpenAI, he is trying to change the narrative, knowing full well that all the "Elon lovers" will help sway the court of opinion on a frivolous law suit filed by Elon in an obvious attempt to do nothing more than slow down Sam Altman's success. Elon's ego is the only problem on display here.
youtube
AI Governance
2024-03-24T05:2…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | mixed |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgwfUsDxqKJ_nM1HMg14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwcc3VbT_36W2syJFZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzAnZsB-gyLAB9DlYh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwrYSsxf7qgcQvsCbp4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxzGTmGDM1KSuKWTAN4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxk2YMcywR9hDbSV3N4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzXMstqwGwcHA9L1Y94AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxyY3JBPbsnV2wvDOB4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxvFu03dQD62lgiVs14AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyyH7QBty0skFFeXF94AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}
]