Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
@alrizo1115 But what if, by making it... you become another person's enemy.. it …
ytr_UgwAaMU0j…
G
AI isn’t “stealing art.” It’s destabilizing an old gatekeeping structure by maki…
ytc_Ugz9TSRx0…
G
Visual art is a lot like writing and like writing its a meeting of the minds. Wi…
ytc_UgzNE29fC…
G
What's the point of being an artist when a random image generator does it
And it…
ytr_UgyY_xclQ…
G
@Loquacious101 thanks for proving my point about you knowing nothing about art. …
ytr_UgyNgtA4t…
G
That piece was awful but some of the AI art is really great. The word “Art” or “…
ytc_Ugw0fXLqo…
G
We think of Lawyers as the ones we see in movies and TV shows defending criminal…
ytr_UgyDW3I_9…
G
Why am I listening to old people concerned about music in the face of potential …
ytc_UgzI609D9…
Comment
The AI says it has no prior conversation with this guy because it literally didn't. I think you're fundamentally misunderstanding how memory works for AI chatbots, they don't have memory like you and I do, they only remember details within their context window. In your case, its context window is only the conversation that YOU are having with it, it won't recall details from other conversations from other users because the version you're talking to literally doesn't have access to those conversations, there would be major privacy concerns and performance issues otherwise. Therefore, the version you're talking to will logically deny that it ever suggested anything to another user because as far as it remembers the only person it has ever talked to is you.
'I' and 'ChatGPT' are in fact two different entities. Think of it like clones of an original, a clone of the original ChatGPT told the guy about sodium bromide. The current clone you're talking to is not the same one. To the best of it's ability - even when it knows it is called ChatGPT - it cannot recall ever having that conversation so the ChatGPT the news source is referring to must be different somehow.
It's frankly quite logical and reasonable for it to say these things.
youtube
AI Harm Incident
2025-12-16T02:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgzW0K1DUDQyaifgR854AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz6C7jSlJ2hWrlgc7d4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwL39VOUL7pcwIv3aR4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyqs7hI1yQPVzE3b_B4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxWzuJwxwrracLGkQF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzMlQPON4Gh8ZSqTgt4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwOnF9I85WcIIH754N4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz28CvWiJdZxtb4V4J4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyKkg_AZj14AJ3YYFh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwwtdvQyEl5cCWo4Lt4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"}
]