Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
The first time mankind created a surplus and someone realised they could live pa…
rdc_d7kuo5i
G
Good news! Openai came out and called the use of these tools "abuse". So yeah, i…
ytc_Ugy8OkWTT…
G
ImDibb this idea bring a robot is stupid because next thing you know we will se…
ytr_Ugj1Wr9Tg…
G
People picking products WILL eventually be replaced by robots? Why? Because peop…
ytc_UgwLJIZMx…
G
I used to work as a translation manager and translators were already using trans…
rdc_kt6foaw
G
Here's my solution for your problem with AI:
Make physical art instead of digit…
ytc_UgzLUFWS9…
G
also I just realized that drum programs being used is still more effort than AI,…
ytr_Ugz2X9LRY…
G
Is this why we dont' see other sentient aliens? They all made AI and then got wi…
ytc_Ugzld5ZS2…
Comment
I don't buy this at all. AI is already "smart" enough to do a lot of white-collar jobs and has been since gpt 4. Engineers forget that we are not the center of the universe; most white-collar jobs require much less cognitive labor than being a swe, yet these people still have jobs, and companies are still hiring for roles despite investing billions in AI. Jobs are about people, not just raw output. LLMs are great at creating boilerplate code or fixing common bugs, but they will not replace human collaboration in making architectural decisions or even fundamentally understanding the code changes they're making (which is why they will often do something technically right but make no sense from a human UX perspective). Lastly, assuming AI will just keep advancing at the same rate and all its flaws will be fixed in due time is just intellectually lazy and not scientific at all. This isn't something as simple as Moore's law. LLMs do not just get exponentially better with more compute and more data past a certain point, and we've likely already reached that point.
youtube
AI Jobs
2026-02-26T16:1…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgzUSY0ewfvQyzduccF4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwtZx9kLCtoqPLVSR14AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw6zEok07ly1M3ix_94AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx0gYPsIjePbdwgL8x4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxvFuffjl1RsoAd80h4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyoQBjLe-FetZIjirB4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugym4-csoQ2bFrc2zzZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyYLuD6dHoZTwyGOFF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw-6k_OVhHOjSesd6p4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzkZEUJKG0nwSEU_zx4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}
]