Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
theredditexperience1 i agree if you are new stay away from tech... or embrace it…
ytr_UgxDEGmah…
G
Maybe very little demand from r/technology Redditors, but lots of demand from re…
rdc_nom24dv
G
Part of me feels like this AI doomsday stuff is a bit of a psyop… you already ha…
ytc_UgxrqyFEq…
G
If AI made good "art" then you wouldnt have to try so hard to prove it does.…
ytc_UgzlUscbF…
G
no the older demographic still occupy the positions, and keep in mind as populat…
rdc_lj93u7y
G
Not being funny or anything but how the fuck is AI going to take all my olds fas…
ytc_UgyEu8Cb4…
G
Dude it's so funny because theyre using an art concept made by ai and adding "fu…
ytc_Ugygrdak0…
G
this is not true i have killed millions with robot humans for decades including …
ytc_UgyG5UBtZ…
Comment
16:03: "...we can't deny that it will also eliminate jobs and and probably a large number of them and so what we need to do is as fast as possible adapt people to using AI and find ways to create jobs faster than we destroy them..."
I seriously doubt Amodei is naive, so short of outright lying I don't know how to explain that statement. One of the main selling points of AI, and a major reason AI companies are spending hundreds of billions of dollars, is to enable businesses that employ their AI products to save large amounts of money on salaries by having AI do jobs people previously did.
This is not speculation – many of the AI companies have that goal written in their company statements and platforms. It's not hidden – all there to read publicly.
So this idea that everyone who will be made redundant by AI will use AI to find new, gainful employment is not only pie in the sky, but runs counter to a key reason why AI is being developed.
Am I missing something?
youtube
2026-02-01T11:2…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgwNdYK_XpBTBJsYdFt4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugys8-Lo-F8YWHX8V8d4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw5nPIvU5NUMaAiPxd4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxCINhYLQQaIHqVIJt4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwRiEcC5uSgWqd96vJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxi7a7uKd50hpgfspV4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyp4CabRDJnK9pALR94AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzTYKQKllrqxRvHEhJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwcMw2Q8kIU9H3X3F94AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzqXqACs44JzJ3h_ch4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"mixed"}
]