Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Comment
WHAT ABOUT THE STORIES THEY posted from resarch that THEY didnt pay for? duble standed no?and on that same not since when in the flying fuck was jurnerlisim work copywritable?! are we just not going to talk about that? since all they are doing is getting resarch thats ALL READY PUBLIC heres what i found out Researchers have been able to copyright their articles—even those utilizing public knowledge, facts, or public domain sources—since the inception of modern copyright law, with the key requirement being that the new expression or compilation of that information is original. While ideas and facts themselves cannot be copyrighted, the specific written interpretation, arrangement, and analysis produced by a researcher has been protected under federal law since the Copyright Act of 1790. Key Historical Milestones 1790 (Copyright Act of 1790): The first US federal law, modeled on the Statute of Anne (1710), allowed authors to secure copyright for "books" (including articles). 1909 Act: Solidified the requirement that works needed to be "published" with a copyright notice to receive protection. 1976 Act (Effective 1978): This was a major shift, providing automatic copyright protection from the moment a work is "fixed in a tangible medium" (written down or saved). This made it easier for researchers to hold copyright on their unpublished and published papers without strict formalities. March 1, 1989 (Berne Convention Implementation Act): Notice (©) became optional, making copyright automatic even without a formal notice. The "Public Knowledge" Distinction It is crucial to distinguish between facts and expression: www.lib.berkeley.edu www.lib.berkeley.edu Public Domain Data: A researcher cannot copyright facts (e.g., "water boils at 100°C") or data that is already in the public domain. Original Expression/Compilation: If a researcher takes public data, analyzes it, and writes an original article about it, they hold the copyright to their text, charts, and unique arrangement, not the raw facts. Case Law: Early US courts established that once an author publishes their work and gives their knowledge to the world, they lose exclusive possession of the ideas themselves, but still retain ownership of their original composition. from a simple google search this shows how broken our copywright system is and needs to be fixed ASAP
youtube AI Responsibility 2026-04-11T20:2…
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitycompany
Reasoningdeontological
Policyliability
Emotionoutrage
Coded at2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723
Raw LLM Response
[{"id":"ytc_UgzHTelq0s2qpaCqHBx4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_UgwDwSTBUCwkOx1E2CZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_UgxcPlZ1GZSnR73ccMx4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_UgzRVNaXCC3N5fTSh9F4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_UgziyyxqyuladkQvZg94AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_UgwX38lg2ohoVfTNf3F4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_UgzQt4Or285ozy6CWvd4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_UgwmPaSxht3cKh_MJCh4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_UgwGNcuvLutoh24xvTh4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugzbh6dVdW5wgoaQAA94AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}]