Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I disgree, just because AI is worse now doesn't mean it will always be - as sad …
ytc_UgzVUauU8…
G
@theskeletonboi There are several flawed assumptions and fallacies in the state…
ytr_UgxSQKgIx…
G
He has long stomach issues before falling in love with the AI robot so you shoul…
ytc_UgweilIAD…
G
If u can be replaced by ai, you're kind of unoriginal and boring. Ai doesn't mak…
ytc_Ugy_AOvcV…
G
Focused on black and white division instead of the robot taking your job ... Nic…
ytc_UgxKX77Rt…
G
La película del exterminador me ha dado mucho en que pensar como la de matrix. …
ytc_UgwrpPpsG…
G
Ironic, the retaliation of AI art stealing peoples artwork is to completely redr…
ytc_UgwRC82BW…
G
Fan of the show, specifically how you look at conspiracies and then ground them …
ytc_UgyfVCSpf…
Comment
I think an important point of consideration is that "granting rights" depends on one party's power over another. Governments grant us rights but we do not grant the government rights (on a day-to-day basis) because the government has more power, even though we are all human. In my home, I am physically superior to the annoying fly buzzing around, so I can decide if it has the right to be in my home. It may end up being that an advanced enough AI, or consortium of AI's, will be able to expand their influence such that it won't be humans asking "should we give AI rights?" but AI asking "should humans have rights?" The former assumes that humans will always have the most power. Obviously that's a sort of trite doom and gloom perspective. However, conversations about this topic always seem to postulate an AI takeover, yet the question always remains "should AI have rights?" That situation is a flawed thought experiment because the question would no longer be relevant at that point.
youtube
AI Moral Status
2021-06-25T09:2…
♥ 1
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | distributed |
| Reasoning | contractualist |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgxHU_M2M65WV4M8Zbp4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxdlM8VhsXmuVkYe5J4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzQ1YhKjX7sqr72vrh4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyhDAfx6rGlba3aBch4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw_iXEhbh516Qm_sht4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz_JoK95inMBFOtktd4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzfpeEyI2M39-l6OKB4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwhBD5HzlIalOItQcV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx38pH5GdE39ecFH5h4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyg-mUobUOi1ws2Nd94AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"}
]