Raw LLM Responses

I see your point, these companies need to hire artists draw new concepts and ideas to feed their algorithm. But, other than that I think AI assissted eativity has wayy too much potential for me not to be excited by it. We could live in world where peeople could create anything they could think off on their own. Not just art either. Movies, games, music. Could all ve rendered and created by a powerful ai that's being told what yo do to do by a person. It would unleash the creative potential of so many people who can't really draw but have reall interesting ideas and concepts of what to draw. Those aren't the same thing. Some people can still focus on the technical side of art, while others can fully focus on developing ther ideas. This is an incredible tool for writers already.. i couldn't explain how much it helps in the writing process to come have an image generator at hand. You'd have to pay an actualy artist to do that, I'd your just testing things out and playing with concepts, I'm sorry but that just needlessly expensive if I can get an ao to do it for a couple of bucks a month. That's just a reality. Also, no matter how much you paid artist, they couldn't be expected to just draw something for you at random points I'm the day. The flexibility these things just isn't something an artist could do. This goes wayyyy beyond just art and images. Still, while I think this technology is incredible I do see that copyright issue. There companies need to find a way to actually hire artist ls to draw stuff ti feed reorganise algorithms. Other than that no one will ever convince me this is bad or shouldn't be developed. The copyright issue does suck though. It shouldn't be done like this and It doesn't need to be done like this. Other than that I think it's amazing and I can't wait for it to get smarter.