Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
So I film myself speaking to the AI as one take (this is where the conversation …
ytr_Ugwt2URgn…
G
When I spoke with ChatGPT it told me there are more advanced versions of AI out …
ytc_UgxUjtAgM…
G
Nah i gotta agree with the ai artists, you are just like me who commissions a gu…
ytc_UgzI_b2Ri…
G
@hrkozl but we actually do something lol im saying use a pencil and paper if yo…
ytr_Ugzgcs8S9…
G
As a scientist I always cautioned that never develop AI beyond a certain level. …
ytc_UgynD_l7P…
G
I can't believe people interact with these AI tools even after all of the years …
ytc_UgxZyR-hL…
G
What so many people seem to forget is that ai CANNOT properly fact-check. It can…
ytc_Ugx0tUtTh…
G
I love how ignorant people recognise that the US being the worst country in hist…
ytc_UgwUA00Lp…
Comment
I think a better solution to opting in is putting requirements on companies once they reach a certain level of popularity to ensure that exact replicas can't be made and that it can only use artist styles. Also require every image to have an immutable metatag that people can verify if its human or AI made. And, of course, any reasonable attempt to impersonate the artist by making a replica website would face legal consequences, though I'm pretty sure that's already against the law.
The problem with opting in is that without good data, ai will be useless and since most artists probably wouldn't opt in, they'd be too lousy and would essentially kill ai.
If you require tags and backend work to ensure it only references styles, which many actually do, then I don't see how artist and AI can't co-exist. It'll actually make real art more valuable if we're inundated with cheap art and real art is rare.
Right now, we're at the beginning stages
youtube
Viral AI Reaction
2023-01-02T02:5…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | contractualist |
| Policy | regulate |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugwa4VEukX4cByGvRPB4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwuNK9I_E7ngXyKkIV4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzM5jHrIiW6lx9G1U54AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxjwvRhUvCRJDlVz-h4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyfDajNifY2z-e7T7B4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx_22SqniYXfwuIJXR4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzF5LiB0YhXAJmdyJ94AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgypGkdvvy8qWKMvo614AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwoRlOlslrCx9I6Zul4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"regulate","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyaPGNt4Z9Q46PtLW54AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"}
]