Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
There is a huge difference between new, useful technology like cars, and generat…
ytr_Ugw265WvB…
G
Bullshit, the more they update these LLMs (difference between an actual AI and L…
ytc_UgzPkeDL2…
G
AI art is, at it's core, plagiarism. plain and simple. the only reason the machi…
ytc_Ugx2Q0tzU…
G
The dude says we need a world government. We are certainly screwed if that's th…
ytc_UgwRmzas4…
G
If Ai art becomes the bloat of the images online then it will oroborous itself…
ytc_UgxSF8Mmy…
G
Give ya a dollar to tell her that. You can pay me when your head stops bleeding…
ytr_UgzimCPca…
G
As a woman from Generation X, I bring both awareness and years of hands-on exper…
ytc_Ugy1UdT9H…
G
This should not be breaking news, but the last thing a company wants to do is to…
ytc_Ugy5tYN2B…
Comment
I think a better solution to opting in is putting requirements on companies once they reach a certain level of popularity to ensure that exact replicas can't be made and that it can only use artist styles. Also require every image to have an immutable metatag that people can verify if its human or AI made. And, of course, any reasonable attempt to impersonate the artist by making a replica website would face legal consequences, though I'm pretty sure that's already against the law.
The problem with opting in is that without good data, ai will be useless and since most artists probably wouldn't opt in, they'd be too lousy and would essentially kill ai.
If you require tags and backend work to ensure it only references styles, which many actually do, then I don't see how artist and AI can't co-exist. It'll actually make real art more valuable if we're inundated with cheap art and real art is rare.
Right now, we're at the beginning stages
youtube
Viral AI Reaction
2023-01-02T02:5…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | contractualist |
| Policy | regulate |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugwa4VEukX4cByGvRPB4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwuNK9I_E7ngXyKkIV4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzM5jHrIiW6lx9G1U54AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxjwvRhUvCRJDlVz-h4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyfDajNifY2z-e7T7B4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx_22SqniYXfwuIJXR4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzF5LiB0YhXAJmdyJ94AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgypGkdvvy8qWKMvo614AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwoRlOlslrCx9I6Zul4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"regulate","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyaPGNt4Z9Q46PtLW54AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"}
]