Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Mine said something similar:
"the most powerful changes in the world often begin…
rdc_m01hxrl
G
Will the future of AI capabilities replace CA jobs. The CA Chartered Accountant …
ytc_UgyY04CCz…
G
The danger is that AI will when it becomes conscious of itself and is independen…
ytc_UgysLscr1…
G
AI LLM dev here.
This guy is delusional and will never win this appeal.
He c…
ytc_UgyV7LdmY…
G
Don't expect too much from this free version Guys, instead try the 4.5 nd you'll…
ytc_UgwHrST6s…
G
MIT found that researchers using LLM's for idea generation had a 40% increase in…
rdc_nlzwu2d
G
I've been a professional software engineer for over two decades now. Everyone's …
ytc_UgyK04ssS…
G
The critizised statements of ChatGPT were in fact more true, than any human stat…
ytc_UgxAmwGnQ…
Comment
I think a better solution to opting in is putting requirements on companies once they reach a certain level of popularity to ensure that exact replicas can't be made and that it can only use artist styles. Also require every image to have an immutable metatag that people can verify if its human or AI made. And, of course, any reasonable attempt to impersonate the artist by making a replica website would face legal consequences, though I'm pretty sure that's already against the law.
The problem with opting in is that without good data, ai will be useless and since most artists probably wouldn't opt in, they'd be too lousy and would essentially kill ai.
If you require tags and backend work to ensure it only references styles, which many actually do, then I don't see how artist and AI can't co-exist. It'll actually make real art more valuable if we're inundated with cheap art and real art is rare.
Right now, we're at the beginning stages
youtube
Viral AI Reaction
2023-01-02T02:5…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | contractualist |
| Policy | regulate |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugwa4VEukX4cByGvRPB4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwuNK9I_E7ngXyKkIV4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzM5jHrIiW6lx9G1U54AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxjwvRhUvCRJDlVz-h4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyfDajNifY2z-e7T7B4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx_22SqniYXfwuIJXR4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzF5LiB0YhXAJmdyJ94AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgypGkdvvy8qWKMvo614AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwoRlOlslrCx9I6Zul4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"regulate","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyaPGNt4Z9Q46PtLW54AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"}
]