Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I think the worst case scenario, that it is... that there's something it's like …
ytc_UgxEk4JjO…
G
not ai fan or something, havent even watched the video but like in 2009 ai was a…
ytc_UgyDw18zy…
G
"The difficulty with relativism is that there is no intermediate position of rel…
rdc_dctp8gy
G
I once saw a post about a “talented ai artist” like bro how the hell one is tale…
ytc_UgyLznAgN…
G
Wouldn't you think pushing this AI is just going to make humanity even stuipeder…
ytc_Ugw9p7WG6…
G
predictive policing sounds like a thing that can be heavily abused at a later da…
ytc_UgzWpu9l9…
G
Self driving cars and the AI does not know how to get out of this?!…
ytc_UgzoKnOnp…
G
Its great to listen to Professor Stuart Russell, the first ever AI expert on ear…
ytc_Ugz730z-l…
Comment
im a dev. I have to say.. AI is pretty amazing. Not only does it code well (in the hands of a skilled dev).. it can also make decisions on strategy.. it definitly helps with efficency and some best paths for dev.. but its not a human skills blanket replacement .. far from it... SO, it shouldn't be removing juniors from work.. it should just be raising the bar and allowing those juniors to enter at a higher level of competency. if it isnt then its the CEOs to blame for not recognising that entry levels can do more today. They're likely busy telling their recruitment team that they dont need entry level because seniors can do entry work as well as their job with AI... but not realising that often juniors can do more too.. and seniors can do more as well.. we should be seeing cheaper production.. cheaper production should create more demand.. more demand should create more jobs.. maybe business/ceos are not looking at this tech correctly and its potential.. they absolutely should NOT be resisting hires of juniors. It will come back to bite them.. unless we suddenly get AGI.. but if that happens it will be so disruptive that quite likely it would wipe out their whole business.. because their own clients will be able to ask the AI for anything.. and likely that will include whatever answer to the problem their product is trying to solve.
If companies start making decisions that will leave humans out or harm society.. then unfortunately we'll have to use the tax system strategically and proportionally against the use of AI.. same way we do against use of cheaper overseas labour. It shouldnt harm business.. if its done correctly. Instead currently we're seeing labour doing the opposite.. taxing human labour with NI whilst no proportional tax on AI. We dont want to slow or harm AI .. but we MUST ensure humans stay in the loop.. for now. And if we do get AGI.. then it we'll need a completely different model.. for society. A fair one!
The AGI is very dangerous though. What we'll have is a human race totally dependent on AI for all skills/tech. If anything goes wrong.. we're just billions of totally unskilled defencless humans. We'd all die..
youtube
AI Jobs
2026-02-18T12:2…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | virtue |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgxDVF5AAl3Feda8TXR4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwuoMnKpMIJTVrPWqx4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxrcxWrmwjkrbCBybp4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwcDWJ5_lTYOeqr4Ot4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzUYgQRoZd-E8mDkNl4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwjUU9FpZtbnWvnHL54AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyXwbCPO8yaFsK3tV94AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzM2XmyOw1N4yXPNOx4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzdQFVjdLEpcoUIzg94AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxBp-88Y2-dt9jLqPB4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"mixed"}
]