Raw LLM Responses

Man, you are clearly have no idea what are you talking about. You are putting an equal sign between artistic value and technics. All art exists in the cultural context and in the modern context technics is always secondary. Your portrait of the dad has LESS artistic value the more "technical (close to photography)" it becomes, thats the thing you are clearly missing here. You say you can not call yourself an artist, and thats true, just because you don't know what an art is. The other thing is whine about "midjourney did it for you" and "i can do that too", when you clearly can not. Making 4 random images of movie hero and curating generation with the clear artistic intent and vision are two completely different things. The first requires nothing, the second requires ability to have that intent and vision. Following your logic we should disregard any painter who do not source brushes by hunting fucking squirells and any photographer who does not manually set exposure using standalone lightmeter. Also, should we disregard ALL of the modern/post-modern art just because "black square was not that hard to paint" and "my son can paint that too"? So again, you are missing the point, which is understandable, if you never had any expirience with art, and never asked yourself what it is and how its done. Your video is art, even if you used zero videography skills to make it. Any image generated with the artistic vision and intent IS ART. No one ever said art should be on the some level of "hardness", thats besides the fact that you have no idea how many time he spend creating that thing. So, if you want to evaluate some artpiece - evaluate it, look at it and reflect what are you feeling about it. Thats what matters in art, something that is above the technics it was done with.