Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G A very interesting approach to this topic. I am really surprised. Well done. I a… ytc_UghR_DYsy… G Oh no how do i get rid of raging ai art glazers 😭 JUST USE THE DEHYDRATION GUN 🗣… ytc_Ugxm123Ng… G Could also be boiled down to overpopulation. Truly one of the greenest things we… rdc_deghgor G I feel like we are anthropomorphizing LLMs too much, and it is giving us mislead… ytc_UgxWPwevF… G art isn't about just talent, it's about skill and the time you put into developi… ytc_UgyOj4A1Q… G I’m going to kindly disagree and I don’t think that AI needs to be controlled. I… ytc_Ugzoa68P7… G The backpack is tied into her butt and fence with string. The fence's string is … ytr_UgwVtvDCp… G I don't get the hate. Roger Haus was a successful artist long before AI became a… ytc_UgznBGaDZ…

Comment

I honestly haven't researched as to whether or not Walter Becker and Donald Fagan actually have copyright to all of the Steely Dan songs, but I don't see how this is even something people are debating. Studio musicians comped pieces for the Steely Dan songs based on prompts by Fagan and Becker. Fagan and Becker did not write note for note the solo for Peg, for example, but they alone have the writing credits and therefore the natural copyright. AI, if provided with sufficient prompting is the hired studio musicians and nothing else. Perhaps I am arguing at cross purposes here, because I generally write the lyrics and song structure, choose key or keys, tempo and chord changes, etc. before I submit anything to AI and technically get the creator copyright before AI even touched it though, but the point still stands. AI = hired musicians in my eyes. The assertion that someone should be denied copyright because AI played something they didn't specifically ask for in detail is like suggesting Becker and Fagan should lose copyright for Peg because they didn't hand Jay Graydon a transcript of his solo and instead let him comp it. Silly sauce.

youtube 2025-02-07T02:1…

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	user
Reasoning	deontological
Policy	none
Emotion	approval
Coded at	2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytc_UgysKUicV5upy83hbH94AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzv9VD8hpJuib_N8XB4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz-oL9gZuUMGQc72RZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyVTb9oOO2BMDXX_bx4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyb9XcR-ZLNy7uqyFd4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxnAwSoq13R-Vv8M_V4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwPUbfnT1czHXqlLvV4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgymWljYp68iucRruk94AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwEm-04Nyxg16OlL2Z4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzKBWoVguVZmqumMwN4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}
]

Raw LLM Responses