Raw LLM Responses

Were I to generate an ai for scientific, and sociological experimentation I would actually keep it offline. Anyone remember the old 80's movie War Games? Well, though they left the back door open the ai, and as primitive as it was then it was still ai, was too base to outdo the human opponent on the whole. Yes it could easily best Mathew Broderick's character on individual match games, however today I believe any openings would be inherently negative for control. I'm deeply interested in generating ai based on the knowledge and personalities of humanities most regarded throughout human history. My personal goal is not in generating the most advanced ai, I endeavor to generate an ai council which comprises of our intellectual giants in earnest. Einstein, Oppenheimer, Copernicus... The concept begins with a computer network cluster. Using the intel ringbus handoff for calculation. The primary pc in the cluster is responsible for storing the memory of documentation on the statements, recoreded video actions, and written works of the ai. The second connected pc is responsible for the subnet consciousness of the ai, it handles the random determination of variables generated by the base system to make determination calculations. The third is the id system, this is where I or rather we'd attempt to establish link between data knowledge and the subnet/subconscious aspects of the prospective ai. The third layer is the interaction layer between the ai and humanity. In this layer intertwined with pc 1 and 2 we can possibly imitate the response said ai intellectual identity would produce were that person alive today to give us a response to our query. While only having a single ai personage of note to use as council has limited benefits, upon recognition of said benefits, I believe it would justify generation of more historical personalities to establish a genuine closed network ai council on pressing matters regarding human civilization and the management of or resources.