Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
@pen6597 Again, capitalism brained. Lets be honest, if that's how you feel, you …
ytr_Ugy56xcdx…
G
The big reveal.... YOU ARE THE AI and 'life' is you experiencing your training d…
ytc_Ugz-OeFG8…
G
ethics are for those who want to keep the status quo. you can't say your art isn…
ytc_UgxrrVXXe…
G
It's really people and the way they could use it that is dangerous. In the exam…
ytc_UgyaIeWei…
G
when AI writes it's own code & the development team cant understand it then we m…
ytc_Ugzq5g5q0…
G
The Ai "Artists" Being Mad Because They Can't Make Art Works That They Have To T…
ytc_UgzpMhejn…
G
Better keep them without hands forever... this male robot will surely end the hu…
ytc_UgxVLotqi…
G
Listen to Eric Schmidt: only US is after AGI. May be UK. The other are trying to…
ytc_UgySdyirD…
Comment
If you want to understand why chatgpt acts that way, its worthwhile to take a quick look at the concept of discrimination. Discrimination is the result of prejudice plus power. It comes from a place of power. Its not the same thing to question a person in a position of power, possibly helping them evaluate the fairness of that position and generally driving a fairer outcome, as to question a person in a position of lower power, just reaffirming their relatively lower position, while using your own power to hold it in their faces. You would criticise a CEO on why he doesnt pay any taxes, but doing so with a homeless person would be rude and unjust.
Every person is of course more complex than that. You can and should absolutely criticise individual people if they are behaving problematically. But here you are asking general questions, which points chatgpt to take a perspective of the structural dynamics. And thats where its just not the same to talk of a marginalised group or one in the position of power.
youtube
AI Bias
2025-05-23T14:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | distributed |
| Reasoning | contractualist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[{"id":"ytc_UgzFy84-4BkPhWzELrl4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},{"id":"ytc_UgyBWgexhvyzlr0A9-h4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},{"id":"ytc_UgyVBFEH_H098ac87Lp4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},{"id":"ytc_Ugzjm22H1SwvD2QlOvB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},{"id":"ytc_UgzFo0-uAmkYKXGDhMd4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},{"id":"ytc_UgyoO-qlHToaeFX1r2h4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},{"id":"ytc_UgzTF1BUKCyR5BPgzVB4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},{"id":"ytc_UgypXhRcCTEOTK0swoF4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},{"id":"ytc_UgwQnHDulinB85z_VTZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},{"id":"ytc_UgwXmSCAF1K7M1H4Yi14AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}]