Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
There should be Agencies to control AI!
This man has a point we need to listen …
ytc_UgwslrGnJ…
G
drive into the guy without the helmet because otherwise people will not wear hel…
ytc_UgiIYchWv…
G
For comparison, A game like Minesweeper takes around 1-2 days to make if done by…
ytc_Ugzkpw4Cg…
G
well rehearsed word Salad. He is here just to profit from the development; I don…
ytc_UgzRUe8li…
G
Last 30 years complexity only rose. AI may help with boikerplate coding, which i…
ytc_Ugz7kJq_g…
G
I'm sorry but the specialist trying to "protect" AI is not doing a great job.…
ytc_UgxkUcQ_Q…
G
if you really want to damage ai. embed an virus in your image and break their s…
ytc_Ugw6mOKRg…
G
Automating the mundane is keyphrase. The mundane will keep on improving and go d…
ytc_Ugye-jF0R…
Comment
This whole tedious discussion reminds me of the big to-do a century and a half ago about how photography was supposedly going to make painting obsolete. The same thing happened all over again fifty years later when color photography became widely available. Both times, the answer was "Actually, people sill want to see paintings."
A case in point: If the best example SolarSands could come up with to make his point was what he shows us at 16:07, then I don't see any reason why the artist in question needs to worry. But what if the AI is able to make really convincing imitations? Well, that's called art forgery, and it's been with us for at least a few hundred years, if not longer. You don't need computers to make forgeries. People still paint "lost" Renoirs and Van Goughs that never existed in the first place and sometimes pass them off successfully. Big deal.
The really frightening thing is what this is going to mean for current event reporting and the historical record. That actually does worry me.
youtube
2023-03-29T06:4…
♥ 6
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgxqU_s1A-5V6CTHiWV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwpur4tJiSbjGa5iGZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz_CKOOm2zB6OvXIad4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzTPZnPcUD4wEokNmh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyH06rGLRY6Gmq_R6J4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgysuG9G29MVQWlZLp54AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy3c1N33kVH006cDeF4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzCFIIFOHeTf1Xy3Op4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwUTMnVbi8GAHuNVw14AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwsJ45Htzk0BT6Zxcd4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"}
]