Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I don't think it really works like that..
"The Ring "Search Party" feature allo…
ytc_UgzJw9CKj…
G
Her attorney, Jay Greenwood, should have some explaining to do.
How is it possi…
rdc_oa4nr3o
G
Hyper-realistic? If you can’t see the difference at first glance there’s somethi…
ytc_UgwTeJ2W6…
G
Only emotion i get from AI art is displeasure and apathy. A program doesnt feel …
ytr_UgxHM0Ip_…
G
DONT EVER SAY THANK YOU TO A FUCKING MACHINE, ARE YOU FUCKING SERIOUS, SAVE THAT…
ytc_UgzpPYCnt…
G
And all of this, so that you can get a unrequested summary of the email you just…
ytc_UgwBEW_uX…
G
The idea that every industry will be automated is of course just fear mongering.…
ytc_UgzGAS7Ki…
G
Plus it isn’t even spelled right they did “hirring” and not “hiring”. Not doing …
ytc_UgxtaKCWc…
Comment
This whole tedious discussion reminds me of the big to-do a century and a half ago about how photography was supposedly going to make painting obsolete. The same thing happened all over again fifty years later when color photography became widely available. Both times, the answer was "Actually, people sill want to see paintings."
A case in point: If the best example SolarSands could come up with to make his point was what he shows us at 16:07, then I don't see any reason why the artist in question needs to worry. But what if the AI is able to make really convincing imitations? Well, that's called art forgery, and it's been with us for at least a few hundred years, if not longer. You don't need computers to make forgeries. People still paint "lost" Renoirs and Van Goughs that never existed in the first place and sometimes pass them off successfully. Big deal.
The really frightening thing is what this is going to mean for current event reporting and the historical record. That actually does worry me.
youtube
2023-03-29T06:4…
♥ 6
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgxqU_s1A-5V6CTHiWV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwpur4tJiSbjGa5iGZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz_CKOOm2zB6OvXIad4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzTPZnPcUD4wEokNmh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyH06rGLRY6Gmq_R6J4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgysuG9G29MVQWlZLp54AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy3c1N33kVH006cDeF4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzCFIIFOHeTf1Xy3Op4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwUTMnVbi8GAHuNVw14AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwsJ45Htzk0BT6Zxcd4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"}
]