Raw LLM Responses

AI is inherently unethical. That doesn't mean good things can't be done with LLM's. Of course they can be used for good intentions. But the potential for good has no bearing on whether the foundation is ethical or not. The creation of these LLM's require unethical practices. A human can be novel, and draw inspiration from other art, yet still produce original works. A software literally merely jumbled pixels from pixels it has been trained on. That is how image diffusion works. You can always get the original training image from any image that an image diffusion software produces. This is not so with a human. image diffusion, like all computing, is merely a mathematical usage of functions - basically copy and then jumble. While a human artist can never perfectly recreate any other work when prompted backwards. Hence an artist can be original, and a machine can't. Beside... The VAST majority of the training data used by these AI models IS copyrighted. As for the derivative work - it can't be derivative by a mere jumbling algorithm. This is not hard to understand. Besides increasingly as of late it is becoming apparent that for every 1 good use of this technology, 10 bad uses or impacts at least are observed. Scammers are having an easier time than ever. Disinformation campaigns are more frequent and effective than at any other point in history. Cheating in education has become trivial (as a teacher this not just annoying to me and my fellow teachers, but this is also eroding the meritocracy that ensure competency for the future work force). The general IQ is dipping in several clinical studies due to people's over-reliance on AI. Do I need to go on?