Raw LLM Responses

I support you, Sam. There are many problems with AI "art." 1. The big tech corporations says, "IT IS OKAY TO HAVE NO CONSENT TO THE OWNER." And then, uses your art. Hmm, does this "no consent is okay" sounds like stealing? It definitely is. 2. The AI is still learning how to create "ART". It has its own mistakes. For example, the fingers has less or more than 5, etc. But! Does this contribute to the argument? Definitely not! The fact that they're STEALING ONE'S ART, ONE'S OWN DEVOTION TO SOMETHING IS IMMEASURABLE. Maybe they should try and learn the art for itself and then make their own model based on their art since they had that belief and THEY MUST KNOW THE FULL RESPONSIBILITY OF THEIR ACTIONS and NOT IMPLICATING SOMEONE'S OWN WORK FOR THE SAKE OF THEIR OWN GREED. 3. Implications for future artists. I think this is self-explanatory. This is based on the common fact that future artists clearly won't have the motivation to create, since something, like AI "art", is making "amazing" and, "more realistic" arts. 4. The development of the art itself. Since future artists won't have the motivation to create something new, the development of art itself will remain stagnant, even degradate. The meaning of ART would mean less than the work of these artificially created machines rather than the pure heart, idea, and drive of the artist. It is a pity that several people these days, weren't truly understanding what is the meaning of ART anymore. The appreciation. The love between the creator and the art. The dedication. Would mean nothing to a bunch of greedy, money-loving people.