Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
@incivism Syntax is explicitly an "old gen" bot, for example. As in, after enoug…
ytr_UgwHhazha…
G
Need more info. Were these people involved in terrorism or extremism? Then they …
rdc_m8iqs6k
G
Harari has described AI as a 'new non-biological lifeform'. That speaks for itse…
ytr_Ugw17e-fN…
G
bro looks like humanoid ai. why do all these tech bros look like robots in skin …
ytc_UgylI9EvV…
G
Y'know, as someone who also people don't seem to agree wether I might be "genuin…
ytc_UgyyrYfnX…
G
I doubt this old dude has really kept up with AI tech. He was in a Diary of a CE…
ytc_UgyJSiOJ6…
G
Can it be assumed 2040 when singularity starts to be the Matrix period when Neo …
ytc_UgzTePF-c…
G
Taylor, it's almost entirely black n brown people trying to point out how they f…
ytc_UgyJaq_EA…
Comment
What i'm surprised is how the solution hasn't been mentioned by anyone. The obvious hasn't been called out.
See none of these companies are cutting jobs because they aren't making money.. they are cutting jobs to reduce paying humans a salary and instead giving the jobs to AI. It's about making MORE and paying out LESS.
A junior isn't required as AI can do the job, a senior could oversee. The junior cannot work, learn and become a senior as the opportunity is taken away? In time, the senior at the role would go and a replacement needs to be made as well. You see the problem but also the solution? WHat companies need to do is invest the extra money they make, back to hiring juniors and allowing them to train and become the new seniors. This is a new way to do things but this change can work, you allow the juniors to exist, get paid but also get the experience to become seniors who will manage and use AI.
You're welcome for sharing this economy saving idea for FREE. Just donate to me
youtube
AI Jobs
2025-08-08T20:5…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugz8R9pxrrMKpD2yMQZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxrfc0aeYfNeq2t9014AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz0Jh1Y0zVzo6jxdJZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyY32vofSzQ5XjOjKJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzxzQxjxRcmpemR3MN4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw6t6AOyR0l8CYs8Ud4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwZ_E4nIoouls35DfV4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyZWnNXGB3nM6nk0uB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw1rB7YAFppXTqNunp4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwq5w_O9ghvc_1FBv14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"}
]