Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Thank you for your positive feedback! If you're interested in more interactive s…
ytr_UgzbTHDjE…
G
Tucker Carlson, An American AI...
"Carlson, activate listening mode." *eyebrows …
ytc_Ugwm6C2vd…
G
You are almost certainly correct. However, the scenario that truly terrifies me …
rdc_kqu0i95
G
We appreciate your perspective. While AI like Sophia may not possess consciousne…
ytr_UgyQREU4C…
G
As a graphic designer, no AI art is not making a massive loss, that's a huge win…
ytc_UgypFMI1t…
G
AI is not the solution but just a tool out of infinite tools we already had but …
ytc_Ugzkr_jhr…
G
Hyper-Novelty will be the force that will disrupt most humans this decade. AI is…
ytc_UgwR9Vjzb…
G
Kenny Groth yeah. im crossing my fingers. if they can just get to the human equi…
ytr_Ugis_hrp8…
Comment
What i'm surprised is how the solution hasn't been mentioned by anyone. The obvious hasn't been called out.
See none of these companies are cutting jobs because they aren't making money.. they are cutting jobs to reduce paying humans a salary and instead giving the jobs to AI. It's about making MORE and paying out LESS.
A junior isn't required as AI can do the job, a senior could oversee. The junior cannot work, learn and become a senior as the opportunity is taken away? In time, the senior at the role would go and a replacement needs to be made as well. You see the problem but also the solution? WHat companies need to do is invest the extra money they make, back to hiring juniors and allowing them to train and become the new seniors. This is a new way to do things but this change can work, you allow the juniors to exist, get paid but also get the experience to become seniors who will manage and use AI.
You're welcome for sharing this economy saving idea for FREE. Just donate to me
youtube
AI Jobs
2025-08-08T20:5…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugz8R9pxrrMKpD2yMQZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxrfc0aeYfNeq2t9014AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz0Jh1Y0zVzo6jxdJZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyY32vofSzQ5XjOjKJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzxzQxjxRcmpemR3MN4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw6t6AOyR0l8CYs8Ud4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwZ_E4nIoouls35DfV4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyZWnNXGB3nM6nk0uB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw1rB7YAFppXTqNunp4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwq5w_O9ghvc_1FBv14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"}
]