Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Microsoft search engine Bing now uses AI and I was able to ask a question on a s…
ytc_Ugw1Cw35h…
G
My guy half the argument is that we as artists don't want artists reduced to fix…
ytr_UgzFRUtfc…
G
The first thing I think is: "That's only 45acp. Try that with 556 or 762."
Next …
ytc_UgxV8LHAf…
G
I know everyone gives this man so much praise for his insight, but AI is not goi…
ytc_UgzgUxM9s…
G
Wow, I wonder who could be behind the dollar weakening, a focus on raising housi…
ytc_UgyG2LJAy…
G
My reason for being polite to AI is simply so I don't lose that habit of being a…
ytc_UgxO1rfKQ…
G
Who is supposed to buy all the services and products provided with AI? When the …
ytc_UgxyCtY-2…
G
I don’t know why he’s asking him about A.I. he’s clearly a layman in that area. …
ytc_UgxmHjfk4…
Comment
You know, I think you maybe changed my mind on this debate. It's reasonable to ask artists if they want to opt in, and pay them for material used to train the AI.
AI artists currently get around the claim of 'copyright infringement' by doing stuff 'in the style of' specific artists. Like you can generate a "Sam-like" image and say "these eyes weren't directly lifted from any image by Sam", or "this background isn't the same as any specific background he made". And I used to think like that... "well, since it's not directly copied, the artist can't claim any ownership and therefore deserves nothing".
But those eyes and background wouldn't exist without Sam's input images, and those are supposed to be protected, and someone else is getting paid based on those protected input materials. So whether it's a 100% copy or not, I think legally it would fall under a "derivative work".
youtube
Viral AI Reaction
2022-12-27T20:1…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | contractualist |
| Policy | regulate |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugw2TDQZTmoPc9vpMwR4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxN1pHP7NGMUKybBjF4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxXj7p7RhnlW1eHXp94AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzHXXqsnV1bZ2rwhEd4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyBApA_QUi0tIlmCxF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy8NAIy7LxWRjmJxlR4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx7U7MD0isrJVPm2NN4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyHiWNJWf0SmbVU50h4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz89u1yEbuRTgpZbr54AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwTwTs8omt-Au_DBkl4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"}
]