Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G So I just want to say that first off, ChatGPT can't read the Bible, it can only … ytc_UgwEgl_mp… G @Cole____ Exactly. AI could be the cure for disease, war, and so many of the sin… ytr_Ugyt1Ckvs… G This is the first video of yours that I saw, and it made me hit that subscribe b… ytc_Ugxu9mWK5… G Charles Petzold’s "Code" and the Nand2Tetris project teach the one principle tha… ytr_UgyzKmNsm… G Here's what I think will happen .We will be replaced by robots and AI. However,… ytr_UgzilGi1_… G Just a Tangent , To Ponder. Mythological stories involving Rakshasas( Demons). … ytc_Ugz1LdP5U… G The mainstream media lies all the time this is nothing new. Is it upsetting beca… ytc_UgwSe7vNf… G I really appreciate AI to help me with complex ontology issues and workflows tha… rdc_mah157p

Comment

You know, I think you maybe changed my mind on this debate. It's reasonable to ask artists if they want to opt in, and pay them for material used to train the AI. AI artists currently get around the claim of 'copyright infringement' by doing stuff 'in the style of' specific artists. Like you can generate a "Sam-like" image and say "these eyes weren't directly lifted from any image by Sam", or "this background isn't the same as any specific background he made". And I used to think like that... "well, since it's not directly copied, the artist can't claim any ownership and therefore deserves nothing". But those eyes and background wouldn't exist without Sam's input images, and those are supposed to be protected, and someone else is getting paid based on those protected input materials. So whether it's a 100% copy or not, I think legally it would fall under a "derivative work".

youtube Viral AI Reaction 2022-12-27T20:1…

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	company
Reasoning	contractualist
Policy	regulate
Emotion	approval
Coded at	2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytc_Ugw2TDQZTmoPc9vpMwR4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxN1pHP7NGMUKybBjF4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxXj7p7RhnlW1eHXp94AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzHXXqsnV1bZ2rwhEd4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyBApA_QUi0tIlmCxF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy8NAIy7LxWRjmJxlR4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx7U7MD0isrJVPm2NN4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyHiWNJWf0SmbVU50h4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz89u1yEbuRTgpZbr54AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwTwTs8omt-Au_DBkl4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"}
]

Raw LLM Responses