Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Robot: "my max speed is 20 mph, you have no chance to escape me"
Me: *Gets in a …
ytc_Ugxn-yVuh…
G
I code because I love to code. I’ve built my own neural network from scratch, no…
ytc_Ugx1khgW9…
G
AI can only copy human intellect. Human intelligence requires far more than just…
ytc_UgycayRBb…
G
bcoz human has sold their humanity to logic, they choose hatred among themselves…
ytr_Ugy0vOlJy…
G
AI will never be able to truly replicate the spiritual essence or emotions that …
ytr_UgwLqbW7i…
G
I've been working on the Web for about 20 years now. From graphic design to 3D a…
ytc_UgxoPDAiF…
G
Don't make it political unless you know what you are talking about. First of all…
rdc_fcsv6s4
G
Sorry AI, but someone else is already coming to bring judgement! These are the t…
ytc_UgzEswQcZ…
Comment
Loomis argued that his Due Process was violated because the algorithm was proprietary and they couldn't rebut the "inner workings." That's a losing argument 10 times out of 10. If they ruled that you must be able to examine trade secrets, then virtually no hardware or software would be admissible in a court. If a security camera caught the event would Due Process be violated without exposing the entire hardware and software design of the camera? It ends up being a procedural issue. Since judges are given wide discretion during sentencing, you would have to prove that without COMPAS the judge would have sentences substantially different.
It's totally a mischaracterization to say SCOTUS "doesn't care" simply because they did not hear the case. SCOTUS only has so much time, and they could simply have decided that there were no glaring issues in the Wisconsin supreme court decision on the appeal. Again, this was predominantly a procedural issue. And keep in mind, at the time there was still a liberal majority in the Court.
If you want to ban states from using proprietary algorithms then *tell your representative!*
youtube
2022-07-26T20:1…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | distributed |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgzG42WDC-z6EpnwyYB4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyN0MORpZaY1v49Lfl4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw-51QLPjQ6yxdapfx4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxwxbiKbar9ktWP3iZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwqf155AC7MjMLIQyt4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyNT-lVYcDsR1Z66KR4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzDSexj0m_MZQrtp894AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz5xL4nSIRF2WVX5pB4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw1i4_BYgtF5y6aGpN4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyeKeAQU0xLkw3RKP54AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"}
]