Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
The umbrella risk of any technological advancement can be reflected by the examp…
ytc_UgwfBFqQe…
G
I am so happy to see that people in the tech sphere are starting to face reality…
ytc_UgywyPnou…
G
"Yeah you still have to draw the piece yourself on digital art but it has a smud…
ytc_Ugzb6mvRy…
G
AI becoming popular after COVID and social media becoming popular is just really…
ytc_UgwX8fOVP…
G
Did a lot of delivery pre ai and cameras for a couple companies. I think if you …
ytc_UgzRiVwyM…
G
AI will replace most of the jobs we know today. but that’s not the end of work,…
ytc_UgxXSEHhX…
G
@Jonathan Stiles well, if the robot said it wanted rights we would be able to de…
ytr_UgyCacD42…
G
Answers are generated from our feeds. Suppose I ask AI to generate some answers.…
ytc_UgxziG1To…
Comment
Loomis argued that his Due Process was violated because the algorithm was proprietary and they couldn't rebut the "inner workings." That's a losing argument 10 times out of 10. If they ruled that you must be able to examine trade secrets, then virtually no hardware or software would be admissible in a court. If a security camera caught the event would Due Process be violated without exposing the entire hardware and software design of the camera? It ends up being a procedural issue. Since judges are given wide discretion during sentencing, you would have to prove that without COMPAS the judge would have sentences substantially different.
It's totally a mischaracterization to say SCOTUS "doesn't care" simply because they did not hear the case. SCOTUS only has so much time, and they could simply have decided that there were no glaring issues in the Wisconsin supreme court decision on the appeal. Again, this was predominantly a procedural issue. And keep in mind, at the time there was still a liberal majority in the Court.
If you want to ban states from using proprietary algorithms then *tell your representative!*
youtube
2022-07-26T20:1…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | distributed |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgzG42WDC-z6EpnwyYB4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyN0MORpZaY1v49Lfl4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw-51QLPjQ6yxdapfx4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxwxbiKbar9ktWP3iZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwqf155AC7MjMLIQyt4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyNT-lVYcDsR1Z66KR4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzDSexj0m_MZQrtp894AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz5xL4nSIRF2WVX5pB4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw1i4_BYgtF5y6aGpN4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyeKeAQU0xLkw3RKP54AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"}
]