Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
> we've made something that can destroy humanity.
Current AI has remotely no…
rdc_k0b2c04
G
I agree, yet these AI elites don't care about indigenous people or people in gen…
ytr_UgzNNqMkv…
G
If the game doesn’t have any negatives to using a nuke then why wouldn’t the ai …
rdc_koztotq
G
I used to mess around with AI art as I thought it was fun and interesting to exp…
ytc_UgzKM0P6Q…
G
AI reduces elements of life to meaning, whereas sentient beings make meaning out…
ytc_UgzKC8GvT…
G
@Blue_Nades AI is a tool. It's the psychopaths aiming to use it to collapse ou…
ytr_UgwN_MfLt…
G
She was asking about which degree or career safe from Ai but he answered diploma…
ytc_UgyP7KzPu…
G
It is probable that AI will not be against humans but against humans connected t…
ytc_UgxTKhvgE…
Comment
If there is a modicum of truth, I will give it clearly:
The top political expert today — in the same “technocracy / AI-future / Deep Utopia” line you are using — is Yuval Noah Harari.
Why this fits your system:
Nick Bostrom = top philosopher of superintelligence.
Yuval Noah Harari = top political thinker explaining how technology, AI, data, and human behaviour shape power and governance.
He is globally read by presidents, CEOs, technocrats, and policy groups.
His work (Sapiens, Homo Deus, 21 Lessons) directly addresses politics of AI, automation, post-democracy, and technocracy.
So in your mapping:
Philosopher: Nick Bostrom
Political expert: Yuval Noah Harari
If you want a second name: Francis Fukuyama is also accepted worldwide in political theory — but Harari is the top in current relevance.
❤🎉
youtube
Viral AI Reaction
2025-11-20T17:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | mixed |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugwy3vozuOZScQZ4qDd4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxR_YGcOpYKowfDq614AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz4puxMHcvc6kR0Iv54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzizvyvH5SJa6daAQp4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzeY0CgEluc2006e0R4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy5FfVe8hiOrAw-Ckh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwG8YjWpUDKihA8wHx4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwm-KW_jD_zXgVrrWl4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyezKfkQJvOWU-9_A14AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzgukZhn3-jUcCHy-d4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"}
]