Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I think the problem lies on the people looking for AI companionships. AI is des…
ytr_Ugw92XfWv…
G
Good that means chat gpt is going to be programmed with a philosophy that will i…
ytc_Ugxw4tZ8m…
G
that’s why AI is an exciting prospect - accessibility can be a great thing. but …
ytr_Ugz49JGOb…
G
So, if someone made art for ai purposes, and they drew similar to you wouldn’t t…
ytc_Ugzb9BW6P…
G
AI is nothing more than biased information imputed into a data base.
This alone …
ytc_UgzNbpRR3…
G
This is Trump's wet dream. He just had declined the assistance of AI company for…
ytc_Ugz4iu1Gq…
G
I think its much more feasible that ai is used to crack network keys, bank passw…
ytc_UgyLjVIhg…
G
Yes exactly we shouldn’t call not even call them artist we should call them ai g…
ytc_UgzI-SG6E…
Comment
Senator Sanders, I really appreciate your concern about AI and automation, and I agree we need to make sure these technologies benefit everyone. That said, I think focusing mostly on the working class misses a bigger picture. AI isn’t just replacing factory or fast-food jobs it’s starting to affect middle-class office jobs, professional work, and even creative fields. Meanwhile, jobs that rely on physical labor or hands-on skills may actually stick around longer than we think.
There’s also a major economic question your speech doesn’t really touch on: if AI replaces a huge chunk of the workforce, who’s going to have the money to buy the things it produces? Without some way to keep people’s income flowing like universal basic income, profit sharing, or something similar mass automation could end up hurting the economy instead of helping it.
The threat of AI is real, but it’s more complicated than just being a “working-class issue.” We need policies that consider the whole workforce and make sure people can still participate in the economy.
youtube
AI Jobs
2025-10-08T03:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | mixed |
| Policy | regulate |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgxqhHhvLIrij4QjC7x4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxVmmTkPXui6HZNYpB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz_UMewRrLLCYhXBWV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy3WGauMU8jShADdad4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyeaFed62-uZhaVqbJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxun4k30lkDtHQB8n14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy7RF5T8s_iDk8oZV54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz3ZjgnSvlvKnqT2DF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyD1Ae4TrJ0tyTFlih4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz-DaSCpEipLa9v5EN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}
]