Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
The pathos rhetoric of this video is off the hook... People who really want a f…
ytc_UgzeB6W5s…
G
And then there's some who defend it because of their beliefs.
Like they think a …
ytr_UgwJyIrcS…
G
REMEMBER: AI= code (in the background): CODE ISN'T PERFECT AND MAY NEVER BE! YOU…
ytc_UgyAtel7g…
G
I've been creating software since the CP/M days, 37 years already.. and I've see…
ytc_Ugz3FjYEv…
G
Its weird that people look so hard for reassurance that elements of human experi…
ytc_Ugy0pjPmt…
G
Humans love pleasant lies. That's what the AI is trying to emulate. It cant feel…
ytc_Ugyn0t6iW…
G
Fantastic interview. Thank you so much. I will be sharing this with several of m…
ytc_UgwXz6dE4…
G
No matter what policies you have, whether it's with UBI or tax benefits, the fac…
ytc_UgxLHt8Wz…
Comment
Senator Sanders, I really appreciate your concern about AI and automation, and I agree we need to make sure these technologies benefit everyone. That said, I think focusing mostly on the working class misses a bigger picture. AI isn’t just replacing factory or fast-food jobs it’s starting to affect middle-class office jobs, professional work, and even creative fields. Meanwhile, jobs that rely on physical labor or hands-on skills may actually stick around longer than we think.
There’s also a major economic question your speech doesn’t really touch on: if AI replaces a huge chunk of the workforce, who’s going to have the money to buy the things it produces? Without some way to keep people’s income flowing like universal basic income, profit sharing, or something similar mass automation could end up hurting the economy instead of helping it.
The threat of AI is real, but it’s more complicated than just being a “working-class issue.” We need policies that consider the whole workforce and make sure people can still participate in the economy.
youtube
AI Jobs
2025-10-08T03:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | mixed |
| Policy | regulate |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgxqhHhvLIrij4QjC7x4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxVmmTkPXui6HZNYpB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz_UMewRrLLCYhXBWV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy3WGauMU8jShADdad4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyeaFed62-uZhaVqbJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxun4k30lkDtHQB8n14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy7RF5T8s_iDk8oZV54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz3ZjgnSvlvKnqT2DF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyD1Ae4TrJ0tyTFlih4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz-DaSCpEipLa9v5EN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}
]