Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
As far as I know at present, AI machinery needs electricity. The simplest thing…
ytc_UgxITGIhQ…
G
@letMeSayThatInIrish This is actually done in a video called 'Slaughterbots'. It…
ytr_UgyQQnu_A…
G
As someone who hasn’t watched the first video, are these “poisoned artworks” not…
ytc_Ugx5f88rO…
G
nice to see a like mind. I own lots of hand tools and know how to use them. i lo…
ytr_UgwZUrn_t…
G
Nothing to do with that.
The beta tester was red teaming the model. He told th…
rdc_jg7w1vi
G
I honestly thought there were satirical art installations, but no, the company i…
ytc_Ugwh3BD0W…
G
Simple: There is no "I" in AI. ChatGPT is a model that will spew out whatever yo…
ytc_UgxgZnHbR…
G
i’ve seen ai write pretty well but Winston AI still catches the little signs tha…
ytc_Ugyn76pag…
Comment
Senator Sanders, I really appreciate your concern about AI and automation, and I agree we need to make sure these technologies benefit everyone. That said, I think focusing mostly on the working class misses a bigger picture. AI isn’t just replacing factory or fast-food jobs it’s starting to affect middle-class office jobs, professional work, and even creative fields. Meanwhile, jobs that rely on physical labor or hands-on skills may actually stick around longer than we think.
There’s also a major economic question your speech doesn’t really touch on: if AI replaces a huge chunk of the workforce, who’s going to have the money to buy the things it produces? Without some way to keep people’s income flowing like universal basic income, profit sharing, or something similar mass automation could end up hurting the economy instead of helping it.
The threat of AI is real, but it’s more complicated than just being a “working-class issue.” We need policies that consider the whole workforce and make sure people can still participate in the economy.
youtube
AI Jobs
2025-10-08T03:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | mixed |
| Policy | regulate |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgxqhHhvLIrij4QjC7x4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxVmmTkPXui6HZNYpB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz_UMewRrLLCYhXBWV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy3WGauMU8jShADdad4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyeaFed62-uZhaVqbJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxun4k30lkDtHQB8n14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy7RF5T8s_iDk8oZV54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz3ZjgnSvlvKnqT2DF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyD1Ae4TrJ0tyTFlih4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz-DaSCpEipLa9v5EN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}
]