Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
@laurentiuvladutmanea why? Why if you have a bunch of realistic Ai generated thi…
ytr_UgxYAdO-n…
G
As if making a minesweeper game would be a hard task for an AI to do. Grow up ma…
ytc_UgwxMiBwQ…
G
This might sound naive, but...
related to the video game industry example, If A…
ytc_Ugx3ZmEc3…
G
Like generation Xennial, im a call you guys Generation ZeX, the ones who were ar…
ytc_UgxjXjpqK…
G
AI is replacing mostly “women’s jobs” first. It’s sad the effect this is gonna h…
ytc_UgwGgu6bA…
G
This is telling half truths , the stability ai statement was in regards to relea…
ytc_UgxmkTk42…
G
if AI isn't art, then why is it called ARTificial intelligence? Haha checkmate. …
ytc_UgyJ1fgXd…
G
The core problem with AI art is that it is by definition *not* creativity; it is…
ytc_Ugx1r_AdZ…
Comment
The reason AI doom won’t happen is the profit motive.
AI doom scenarios ignore the most fundamental driver of technological progress: the profit motive. Whenever an AI model underperforms or fails to deliver value, its creators have every incentive to retrain, improve, or replace it. The market rewards better performance, not destruction. As a result, AI systems continually evolve to serve human goals more effectively. They are tools, not autonomous threats.
Even a hypothetical AGI would operate within the same economic and feedback constraints as other AI systems—its development and maintenance would depend on human goals, data, and market incentives. If you disagree, feel free to define AGI and explain why you think it would escape those forces.
Humans evolved independence through biological and reproductive pressures. Tools, by contrast, evolve through design and human incentive pressures. AI/AGI beeing a tool is subjected to incentives that stem from human interests, not self-preservation.
youtube
AI Governance
2025-10-28T03:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | industry_self |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgwShpY7vnGJ6FN3abF4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwqdDQQ_vI7ZNBzjMJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwUY_lRVS5ZZAkYLON4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz3VBI68jSEH5KgFiV4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxsFdElBL8I682Mas14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy0vow4XnM68m6Nhf14AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwQ6h1o4TcPYW_iicB4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwn9FK3peHHQyYzLr94AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx2rKiKJp9axraLbdZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz7gI_yy04N4gtao614AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"}
]