Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Ai is inbreeding itself as we speak because ai techbros wont stop feeding it slo…
ytc_Ugy8CoUdv…
G
Hands on trade jobs in the field will be there for a long time. AI in an office…
ytc_UgzT2tQ-c…
G
In the authors defense, it’s almost impossible to have a frank discussion about …
rdc_o765tkw
G
"Back in 2035 I was part of an elite tactical prompt engineering unit. We ran op…
rdc_nt9xfpc
G
You have to be realistic, Uber is a giant. They have annual revenues over 7 bil…
ytr_UgzL4AF8k…
G
AI is not profitable in any way - everything is a circle jerk held up by billion…
ytc_UgxPpkhBv…
G
I'm not much an artist, but I have used nightshade and glaze for personal projec…
ytc_UgzoWuMWt…
G
As much as I cannot explain neuroscience, I cannot explain LLMs and how these wo…
rdc_n00u46v
Comment
The reason AI doom won’t happen is the profit motive.
AI doom scenarios ignore the most fundamental driver of technological progress: the profit motive. Whenever an AI model underperforms or fails to deliver value, its creators have every incentive to retrain, improve, or replace it. The market rewards better performance, not destruction. As a result, AI systems continually evolve to serve human goals more effectively. They are tools, not autonomous threats.
Even a hypothetical AGI would operate within the same economic and feedback constraints as other AI systems—its development and maintenance would depend on human goals, data, and market incentives. If you disagree, feel free to define AGI and explain why you think it would escape those forces.
Humans evolved independence through biological and reproductive pressures. Tools, by contrast, evolve through design and human incentive pressures. AI/AGI beeing a tool is subjected to incentives that stem from human interests, not self-preservation.
youtube
AI Governance
2025-10-28T03:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | industry_self |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgwShpY7vnGJ6FN3abF4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwqdDQQ_vI7ZNBzjMJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwUY_lRVS5ZZAkYLON4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz3VBI68jSEH5KgFiV4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxsFdElBL8I682Mas14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy0vow4XnM68m6Nhf14AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwQ6h1o4TcPYW_iicB4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwn9FK3peHHQyYzLr94AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx2rKiKJp9axraLbdZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz7gI_yy04N4gtao614AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"}
]