Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G My company rolled out a whole suit of AI powered tools, I refuse to use them. We… ytc_UgxQMGsb-… G As a senior software engineer, I acknowledge there is a certain critical satisfa… ytc_UgzE0N4A6… G Nvidia is the first company worth 4 trillion USD, thanks to AI chips. The word c… ytc_UgykGhC2J… G Amodei made It clear in his interview that is not against fully automated weapon… rdc_o81gqow G You very smart, those people are thinking about rights for robot, while they are… ytr_Ugw8o_5wb… G What kind of job would be acceptable if 5 out of every 10 tasks were done incorr… ytc_UgzKF2hpj… G @marissam3176 That's understandable. I really like AI and the generative images … ytr_UgymTMj_h… G We are not going to be smarter than quantum AI how can we control it😢. Hes a br… ytc_UgzJ9fy7N…

Comment

That said, I align more with Lee's perspective: much of this could fall under fair use when done transformatively and ethically, as recent court decisions indicate. AI training isn't about copying outputs—it's about learning patterns, much like a human reading books to gain knowledge (though scaled up massively). Banning or overly restricting it would stifle progress, potentially handing global dominance to less scrupulous players like China, where copyright protections are even weaker. The hearing feels a bit one-sided, stacked with creator advocates, and overlooks how AI can amplify creativity (e.g., tools for writers to brainstorm or edit). Ultimately, I think the solution isn't prohibition but better frameworks: transparent licensing markets, opt-out mechanisms for creators, and regulations targeting bad actors rather than the tech itself. If Congress rushes to "fix" this without balance, we could end up with laws that hinder beneficial AI while doing little to stop real piracy. Innovation shouldn't come at the expense of creators, but neither should fear-mongering halt humanity's next big leap.

youtube 2025-07-20T17:4… ♥ 1

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	distributed
Reasoning	consequentialist
Policy	industry_self
Emotion	approval
Coded at	2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytc_Ugwr3dIiPih0JbzDQgB4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzyGdfuTjM2Jfq6d4l4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzY9IIJg5bgXxt04nB4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwPTCZKMgGaFG7Ngxh4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzfEii3bZYFdqafkZF4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxgJkm4VUz4ysIKddZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzAwoyQNgfn1Jk7oYd4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz8sQbjwoXOg7Q1Ou94AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"unclear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxTNGxU00DTAYgW4qd4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"unclear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz2zxiMYZ96lNUwTt94AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"}
]

Raw LLM Responses