Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
A word of warning about these tools*.
These tools actually make gen AI *better…
ytc_UgzVGEzbz…
G
So those who keep on getting habitual absences in their BPO work will be the fir…
ytc_UgzB9vj7l…
G
Calling artists gatekeepers for not liking AI is like calling runners gatekeeper…
ytc_Ugyrt04jV…
G
Btw I really do believe AI can be used in things and be a very good thing. BUT w…
ytr_UgyiP64ot…
G
If anything, the “ai artists” are stealing from both real artists and the ai its…
ytr_Ugxn73XKL…
G
In addition to the doctor, get her off social media. I had a similar episode but…
rdc_m2djql6
G
I don't trust people , I'd trust AI even less . Humans have skills that AI doesn…
ytc_Ugz0YiLN9…
G
The current risk for AI to kill all humanity is about 5% 😂
Don't worry guys, we …
ytc_Ugxadv3eI…
Comment
Guys I'm sorry, but this really does scream staged. Hear me out.
*Situation: Artist's Friend STEALS Art And Feeds It To AI To PROFIT*
*Their whole dialogue was:*
- Can i come clean about something
- Sure bestie, you know, i'm always here to listen! Is this about your girlfriend?
- No-no, it's not about her. It's about those AI images of your art yesterday.
- Oh no, did they make another account? Cause i'll crash out fr
- You know how i said they were on deviant art, and that they deactivated before I could take a screenshot
- Yeah
- It's my account.
- Oh!! Did you get hacked? Tbh i didn't even know you had a deviant account lmao
- I made them, I'm sorry
- What?
- I'm sorry okay? I've been doing it for awhile now, you know I don't have a job and need the money. My mum said that she isn't letting me work until next year and I want to get that new part for the PC I've been building. And I heard about how people on deviant art have been making money from ai generated images. So I've been taking your ones to sell, since yours are easy to generate compared to just basic prompts. But I was able to get that spare part and I'm making enough for my girlfriend. Sorry I shouldn't have lied to you (edited)
Can you please delete that post about it? It's kind of embarrassing even if it doesn't say my name, it makes me feel shitty (edited)
- I've known you since 2020, how long have you been doing this?
- Since mobian ai was out.
- FUCK NO
I can't believe you, we have known each other for 4 years and you have the audacity to ask me to delete the post??? Because you are embarrassed??????
- I'm sorry, but you know I need the money.
-YOUR PARENTS ARE LOADED???
Don't talk to me again, if I ever see you trying to sell my art again I will press legal action no joke.
*Show, don't tell*
So, in writing dialogues you have to put subtext (show, don’t tell) for it to be believable. Here, all the necessary information is dumped directly into our heads:
- “Sure bestie, you know, I'm always here to listen! Is this about your girlfriend?”
- "You know how I said they were on DeviantArt, and that they deactivated before I could take a screenshot.”
- “I've known you since 2020” / “We have known each other for 4 years.”
All this exposition is told, not shown, which is not how real people talk. This is the same mistake you see in cheap shows: “As you know, Bob, our wives are sisters…”
Think about how you actually talk to friends. If your friend said: “Can I come clean about something?” - you wouldn’t reply with “Sure, bestie, I am always here to listen!” You’d just type “?”, “what?”, “yeah?”, “about what?”
In real conversations, we don’t state our roles or exposition because both sides already know the dynamic. Those roles come across through quirks, jokes, and shared knowledge - not by saying “Sure, bestie” or “As you know, I told you they were on DeviantArt…” or “As you know, Bob, I’ve known you since 2020…”
*Inconsistency of motivation*
The friend’s stated goal is: “I need money for PC parts.” But why would that lead her to steal her close friend’s art? She could have taken someone else’s, or even made her own sketches and run them through AI. The results weren’t even polished (watermarks left intact), so why target a friend specifically? If the friendship history mattered, you’d expect her to avoid hurting them, not use them. But ok, maybe she just didn't care about their friend?
But if she didn’t care about her friend’s feelings, why come clean at all? Confessing doesn’t get her closer to her goal (money). She could have just created another account and targeted another artist. Her actions actively contradict her own motivation.
So we’ve got:
- inconsistent goals and actions,
- exposition-heavy dialogue,
- a hot-button topic (AI theft),
- not a lot of “evidence” (screenshots of chat and that's about it).
All of it together feels… off.
Important: Of course, this isn’t an accusation - just speculation. But it really is strange. If she wanted to make this believable, she should have shown more concrete proof than just chat screenshots. Right now, it looks highly suspicious.
youtube
2025-09-17T05:3…
♥ 3
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | user |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgyzeZYBw3s0qwe7x0t4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgypYHPM01QzhyEcAVJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"disapproval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyrapC3iG687NgWzTN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzkGcYvqOctBBCwmzl4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwmb6emMhG9BN-0yWR4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwkYrdI2eXsFbEV14p4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyR1zaEsTDOhrMQekd4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz1zgCAPGQ90oFHYCJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwMx2M5eqPiPcvLgEd4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwey5YzlcCae83r7Rt4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"resignation"}
]