Raw LLM Responses

OMG! There's so much to say here. I haven't even made it to the 1/2 way point and I just can watch anymore. Pro worker AI. That is not a thing. This is clearly coming from Economists that haven't used any agentic AI. Look at it this way. Prior to GPT 3.5 being released, the economy was a square peg. Every day since then, that square peg is being shaped into a round peg and you keep trying to fit it into the same hole. If you're not looking at the worst case scenario of all human labor replaced and what the economy would have to transform into, you've already failed. Having a plan for the worst case, you can easily adopt along the way. Trying to figure out how to adapt to the next step in the evolution is always going to fail. The comment about not believing that the labs have more powerful models just shows how little you know about AI. The post training process makes these models dumber so they don't do harmful stuff. The version of the model that the labs have, ISN'T dumber, you are for not realizing this! Seriously, Economists are just not getting it and they are the ones that NEED to get it. The transition period is going to be very bumpy because YOU are failing at developing the plan on how to transition. There is no stopping the transition. That genie has left the bottle and there's no putting it back or trying to curtail it like you idiots are thinking of doing. PLEASE use AI so you know what is coming. Buy a frickin Mac Mini and play with OpenClaw. Only then will you fully understand what is coming. I'll state it one other way. There's a technological tsunami headed our way and you're arguing where to put the deck chairs. Plan better!!!!