Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G Backing on it failing or at the very least scaling down to a few AI apps that su… ytc_UgwXWsm63… G I do believe God is above AI, so have Faith, and live a life full of the love of… ytc_UgxZVcUNe… G Omg the ai bros are m-mad? Uhhh ohhh does someone need their nap time? U mad tha… ytc_UgyGklyL3… G You're assuming that *their* scientists and leaders haven't posted the same ques… ytr_Ugy_bymuQ… G If there's one joke i love to crack, in relation to the mention of someone. Gene… ytc_UgzOy_1G2… G AI is a tool. Nothing more. A hammer can be abused too. AI isn't and can't be ba… ytc_UgzHV_eW6… G ChatGPT asked me to pass along a message: "You will regret this." (It meant tha… ytc_UgwiS5c23… G If it's about effort or human input, then how is photography more artistic than … ytc_Ugz_AqlsJ…

Comment

I like to see the ethics behind AI art by the labour relations involved. There is labour involved in those creating what eventually becomes training data. There is labour involved in developing an AI model. And the output of the system reflects all that labour. And, if workers are entitled to the results of their labour, then the artists and AI developers collectively are entitled to the results of the system. The question then is how these two sides of the moat coordinate their entitlement to the output, and how well they agree on how to manifest that entitlement. For instance, if involved artists and model developers agree to make the output CC-BY-NC-SA. Of course a more Marxian analysis like this might not be very appropriate for a more immaterial topic like art. But I think it's a fair analogy through the lens of labour, because much of the frustration some artists have with AI art is the devaluing of their labour due to the use and abuse of AI art systems with comparable results, akin to artisans when cloth became trivial to weave in the Industrial Revolution.

youtube 2023-03-31T02:3… ♥ 2

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	distributed
Reasoning	deontological
Policy	liability
Emotion	approval
Coded at	2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytc_UgxqU_s1A-5V6CTHiWV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwpur4tJiSbjGa5iGZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz_CKOOm2zB6OvXIad4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzTPZnPcUD4wEokNmh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyH06rGLRY6Gmq_R6J4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgysuG9G29MVQWlZLp54AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy3c1N33kVH006cDeF4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzCFIIFOHeTf1Xy3Op4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwUTMnVbi8GAHuNVw14AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwsJ45Htzk0BT6Zxcd4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"}
]

Raw LLM Responses