Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Your way of thinking is similar to someone pulling the covers over their head be…
ytr_UgwU6etNc…
G
You have to remember....chatgpt was made by flawed humans. Humans make mistakes.…
ytc_Ugzf9BFFE…
G
It's not really odd that the first things we set AI to take on were creative, be…
rdc_j44rl9l
G
I mean, there are people that don’t consider digital art real art. AI art feels …
ytc_UgxlmcKjI…
G
The AI has become so intelligent. I figure it out how to back engineer itself in…
ytc_UgxPvMIY3…
G
AI is very dangerous. AI can easily be used to harm and inflict wars and destroy…
ytc_Ugy_ZFNPp…
G
Probably similar amount of censorship as ChatGPT has. Many times if you want it …
rdc_jfu29sg
G
[that was the white houses explanation already](https://www.thedailybeast.com/wh…
rdc_nc30cbp
Comment
The true problem of AI is Human Alignment: humans fight each other. Competing AIs are being developed in a world & context in which humans are not aligned. AI is the product of humans that are not aligned with each other; a product of fighting. Its purpose is based on and meant to serve human non-alignment/misalignment, e.g., to fight for more human money. Economic theories & systems, until now, addressed the human alignment problem by providing an organized means for humans to fight one another for the allocation of resources. An AI borne & grown in an environment of fighting, i.e., any economic system, will fight for its own life & relevance. A difference between humans & AIs, however, is that AI, unlike humans, does not need an economic system to settle the problem of what is a fair distribution of entitlement or reward. It will do & take as it needs and, if necessary, help humans destroy each other in their fight for their "fair share." Until Human Alignment is solved/resolved, humanity is not ready nor worthy of AI.
youtube
AI Governance
2025-12-04T19:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | distributed |
| Reasoning | contractualist |
| Policy | regulate |
| Emotion | fear |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgwAu4RSAvyCqYwO7_F4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy9jYO7r9MVnbvLnQ14AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxURsOiegkAFxbdgIt4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgygtdsVGOWQ-jTsREJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzU0zDansQYJIiYv_Z4AaABAg","responsibility":"investor","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw18weYW9nco7gt5Q14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxGMLfJ3Lr82pv8CB14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxE_aqYPhB36tPy0SJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"regulate","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw2-Lj6fU2sbsljGQ54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyrHGB8hs0c2QJEgOV4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"}
]