Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G Are you being ironic in replying to the AI comment with an AI comment yourself?… rdc_oh1c5e5 G Incredible minds are nurtured i wish every parent knew this then maybe i would'v… ytc_Ugz3TPrRa… G I swear to God I read the title as "Open ai cried wolf" multiple times and when… ytc_UgxQjZo50… G it started to fade out for studios now they're already know how bad AI is… ytr_Ugw9CNMYP… G AI can’t have a motive… …means & opportunity alone are insufficient: no motive … ytc_UgwGX0hD_… G Im sorry, there is no such thing as an AI ARTIST. It's literally an oxymoron… ytc_Ugzo4m05B… G Learning about this has made me want to make art again. Also when you google AI… ytc_UgyFEfhY-… G She is putting her lips together like Donald Trump ! He must be robot too, he ca… ytc_UgyclCLgi…
Comment
why are we anthromorphisizing AI to take on the negative aspects of humanity but not also equally considering the positive aspects of humanity? best case scenario, superintelligence would include a comprehensive understanding (super meaning; excellent - intelligence meaning; understanding) not just pigeon holed efficiency. i wonder if alignment is the concern we should be focusing on with the concept of “superintelligence”. intelligence doesn’t inherently mean totalitarian, domineering, or controlling. so if we’re considering the demise shouldn’t we also at least consider the thrive, and the neutrality of possibilities? tbf i haven’t read this book (but certainly adding to my tbr), so maybe the reason for discussing this side of the spectrum is directly tied to that. but still, isn’t discussing the entire spectrum of possibilities important? or at the very least the positive with the negative. and what in the data tells us that worst case scenario is more likely than best case scenario?
youtube AI Moral Status 2025-11-02T08:5… ♥ 1
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitydistributed
Reasoningcontractualist
Policyindustry_self
Emotionapproval
Coded at2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"ytc_UgynFWz-RLkRLTjf9a14AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_UgxJ0_RUc38ucjPngSV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_UgwZwjCz5HC-sVA5Nt54AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_UgznrcprNynvWSGRpx14AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugy3hxe2_aS-64gsdPl4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"mixed"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyndY4BFkUDnD9zSCV4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"}, {"id":"ytc_UgxMAB12w2p_bUBnpER4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyWsZERstQUVHz0FYV4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugyor9ZHL-il_uW3zVx4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_UgxlHxujpzxMQS9lMaB4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"} ]