Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G I suggest not looking that up if you don't know what it is... I mean... Everyone… rdc_je426uy G sounds like impressive work, but calling it a startup, while technically correct… rdc_m9gomf6 G A politician worried about AI manipulating public opinion. LOL Must be worried t… ytc_UgwOjSi6J… G Humans are not particularly good at making a sacrifice now to save themselves or… rdc_nxpioix G we're toast, we're cooked. is their subconscious mind envisioning ai making huma… ytc_Ugz510j8p… G They're already marketing robot police dogs to cities. They just bombed Iran be… ytc_Ugy11q0K8… G OUTSTANDING VIDEO. I've been curious about ChatGPT, but I have been leary of usi… ytc_UgwVFBOZj… G Didn't anyone in the AI industry ever see the movies War Games and Terminator? G… ytc_Ugxq0rQRm…
Comment
why are we anthromorphisizing AI to take on the negative aspects of humanity but not also equally considering the positive aspects of humanity? best case scenario, superintelligence would include a comprehensive understanding (super meaning; excellent - intelligence meaning; understanding) not just pigeon holed efficiency. i wonder if alignment is the concern we should be focusing on with the concept of “superintelligence”. intelligence doesn’t inherently mean totalitarian, domineering, or controlling. so if we’re considering the demise shouldn’t we also at least consider the thrive, and the neutrality of possibilities? tbf i haven’t read this book (but certainly adding to my tbr), so maybe the reason for discussing this side of the spectrum is directly tied to that. but still, isn’t discussing the entire spectrum of possibilities important? or at the very least the positive with the negative. and what in the data tells us that worst case scenario is more likely than best case scenario?
youtube AI Moral Status 2025-11-02T08:5… ♥ 1
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitydistributed
Reasoningcontractualist
Policyindustry_self
Emotionapproval
Coded at2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"ytc_UgynFWz-RLkRLTjf9a14AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_UgxJ0_RUc38ucjPngSV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_UgwZwjCz5HC-sVA5Nt54AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_UgznrcprNynvWSGRpx14AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugy3hxe2_aS-64gsdPl4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"mixed"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyndY4BFkUDnD9zSCV4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"}, {"id":"ytc_UgxMAB12w2p_bUBnpER4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyWsZERstQUVHz0FYV4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugyor9ZHL-il_uW3zVx4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_UgxlHxujpzxMQS9lMaB4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"} ]