Raw LLM Responses

Thats kinda annoying people think reference equals copying basic shit from ai pictures, normally use reference to patterns or style but not some basic shit like pose, obviously thier pose and everything is copy and looks so uncanny, idk what ai you'd use but I'd mostly use chatgpt. Id use both Google and chatgpt. To use chatgpt fully to learn from it will not really work or learning basic stuff in art. But for me I think I normally don't go out too often, and sometimes when I research in Google I don't really look much of what I'm looking for, and researching I'm not really a fan of if I have to research over again chat gpt mixing things together it looks so much better, but looking up close it's has alot of mistakes that doesnt make sence, but it's like when you go out and look at your surroundings, you get ideas as reference in some things not to copy it, same with chatgpt art for me. Here's what I'll say though, if people copy mostly from ai then they can't be a real artist and most of it is just soulless, id normally still learning the basics and still put my soul into it, id use some reference in Google and in chatgpt but I wouldn't just copy the chatgpt or in Google images.so using ai it just depends how you use it but i wouldn't use for simple stuff artist should normally learn like the basic stuff, but it's nice when it comes to patterns or landscapes as reference but not to copy or to understand, it's nice if your trying to draw something that's like dreamcore or uncanny, but other than that I wouldn't use it if I'm referencing real life or go overboard to thinking ai artist is good unless they mostly put thier soul into it and only use ai as a tool not someone to copy thier homework off of.