Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Claude 4.0 was down at work today and I had to downgrade to 3.7
Legitimately un…
rdc_n3kxllx
G
"the thing to destroy npc"
"they have 0 I.Q in fighting so punch him"
"off the…
ytc_Ugx_J1lah…
G
It's what they want; mass confusion. It's what they've been working towards, wit…
ytc_Ugw2rTTfF…
G
These AI people need to explain this to me. If humans aren't working and making …
ytc_Ugz5NPUqJ…
G
AIs that are fully aware and have consciousness, must get the same rights as hum…
ytc_Ugx7qnZow…
G
They are wrong ai art isn't close. To the fountain. That would be programmable a…
ytc_UgzCs2xAU…
G
it's like any skill, if you don't use it, you lose it. Balance is required, to k…
ytr_UgzU6EaJe…
G
But honestly... I think we need to pump the brakes on these Data Supercenters. N…
ytc_UgxJgVs7d…
Comment
What stood out to me here isn’t the idea of “future AI risk” — it’s how quietly authority is already shifting today.
In many organizations, the issue isn’t runaway super-intelligence. It’s the gradual normalization of AI outputs becoming the default starting point for decisions, reviews, and approvals. Once speed and polish become the primary signals of quality, human judgment moves downstream — or disappears entirely.
This is a pattern I’ve been documenting across real workplaces where AI doesn’t need to be autonomous to change who is actually deciding. It only needs to be convenient, consistent, and time-saving.
The real risk is passive adoption without clear responsibility.
If no one can explain why an AI-assisted decision made sense then authority has already drifted, even if no policy was ever changed.
Unexamined delegation is the problem.
youtube
2026-01-28T22:3…
♥ 5
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | distributed |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | fear |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[{"id":"ytc_UgwJjVPPxRKLk_EhFuV4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},{"id":"ytc_UgyoQNZaYdLgmJSUNyN4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},{"id":"ytc_Ugw2PlaLm0IcC3ThBNN4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},{"id":"ytc_UgzLR4Kb7lW-vqQ4VFB4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},{"id":"ytc_UgyU7KI1Pz1XtRuQfB94AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},{"id":"ytc_Ugyoj4NRJNDUbL0GlPV4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},{"id":"ytc_UgxnT51F-tccieTZSrJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},{"id":"ytc_UgxAyewDdmXOKWAb8CZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},{"id":"ytc_UgwR2AH_xdmySHHX_nl4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},{"id":"ytc_UgzaUD67bAVjkmcXGz14AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"}]