Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
17:30 – Like the time a group of Marines outsmarted one of DARPA’s AI robots. Th…
ytc_Ugz9dfz2M…
G
we cannot do anything if its for betterment of humanity, and if its not then it …
ytc_Ugx5JbLiC…
G
How sure are we that this is due to only AI and not the offshoring of management…
ytc_Ugws4npRp…
G
Interesting discussion.
The idea that you should need to consent to a change i…
ytc_UgzlKUZfr…
G
I dont think we get to question AI about consciousness until we have clear under…
ytc_Ugyl6XbDs…
G
The most tragic part of AI is the surrendering of creative agency. AI artists ar…
ytc_UgzgEpfPb…
G
I think possessing deepfaked porn should also be illegal. The problem with the i…
ytc_UgwX8Tjtu…
G
The Robot was playing him like a slot machine, his eyes spun up into his head.…
ytc_UgxKXqbyI…
Comment
As a professional software engineer who uses AI tools daily — from autonomous agents to integrated assistants in code editors — I find it hard to take seriously the claim that a future AI couldn’t be shut down. These systems ultimately run on physical servers powered by electricity. From a software engineering perspective (even without being an AI researcher), it seems extremely unlikely that there would be no way to disable or dismantle a system we ourselves built. Kill switches, air-gapped environments, power cutoffs, and hardware destruction are all trivial fallback options.
There’s also a huge leap in assuming an AI could somehow “escape” its containment by magically rewriting the entire internet stack, bypassing decades of hardened protocols, operating systems, and network security. Yes, we’ve seen concerning incidents (like the recent Anthropic research showing models can be prompted to take unauthorized actions when given tools), but that’s still a far cry from an AI autonomously breaking out of its sandbox and seizing control of unrelated infrastructure.
youtube
AI Jobs
2025-11-20T13:2…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgyoQSVvBHxNAec2TSp4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzw6-JORR53HykCMfN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyMJXdagIBgbscKKqF4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxYaYceVlfdfeIkERN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx-E_UybuePPqCRVF14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxmYO49m6g4zp3Tvq94AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx4AliBBBEkUc5e9wF4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy8vckkVQrnHS1BERl4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxaEsdV4nW830veEgh4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxo0fZYqVQCY8s94-N4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"}
]