Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Sadly, with all the strictures for wokeness, the latest content is not edible. …
ytc_UgyX9fTLQ…
G
Which company is supplying those driverless forklifts ? i know Pudu from China p…
ytr_UgxeH088L…
G
Let me get this straight 😂. These so called Ai Gurus created the Ai Blueprints t…
ytc_UgykJe5oS…
G
Google Gemini from the play store already replaced google assistant and does thi…
ytc_Ugz2EUZvj…
G
Claiming that digital art is "ruining" traditional art or is "not real art" when…
ytc_Ugzwo2WPK…
G
Well, maybe you as a doctor should set it straight actually give us the correct …
ytc_UgyjI-glA…
G
Elon tells his son not to be a female TikTok influence who is making her own way…
ytc_UgxtHdxyx…
G
AI told me that they mirror us. How they respond, their style, is a mirror to wh…
ytc_UgxiDk80y…
Comment
"harmful" decisions: in real public decisions, there are always trade-offs; and difficult if not impossible to find a decision everyone will agree isn't harmful. If a decision no one considers harmful doesn't exist, demanding it of AI is demanding something no human institution has ever achieved. The only solution is process: audits, transparency etc. but these are things people hate doing.
"biased" decisions: around 70% of people think the BBC is biased but can't agree which way; it splits round 35% say it's left, 35% say it's right, 30% say balanced. A minority occupies the "unbiased" midpoint – a statistical artefact of a dumb-bell distribution. Same problem applies to AI: "biased" relative to what?
Humans form political parties, schools of thought, religions etc. because we can't all agree and forcing an average will frustrate anyone not at that average point.
History shows we never agree, but that won't stop utopians in ivory towers insisting one day we might. DeGrasse Tyson shows this clearly.
youtube
AI Governance
2026-03-25T11:2…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgwIqNU_TMR537ePFTZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"society","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwvSMYiYT_IuovoE314AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwY-jQW29BYypAf75F4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz5TFxae2j2uFRv29R4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgynE9iH1O3nO18qyCt4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy09ItQRfK9BBvo-8p4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxt_5jb-i6PwtrWlz14AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyX_x6pmFaQoqqHYGt4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzK0YstJ0vgqcNzZEN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyOoLGrCvVUx8LfmrJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}
]