Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Haha yeah right, 99.9% of end users aren't like this. Lets see ChatGPT handle a …
ytc_UgzpSYgEM…
G
Its human's fault that chatgpt is a liar. We lie all the time as well and it's p…
ytc_UgxjuwL23…
G
Magats want to eliminate wasteful spending, Why pay uneducated dummy's to do a j…
ytc_Ugx1oQoNE…
G
I’ve been using ChatGPT for several months, and seeing how it learns, adapts and…
ytc_Ugz4yJJii…
G
It's less an "erudite" level, more an overly flowery, stilted manner of speech t…
ytc_UgzqTgA-F…
G
No, the robot in the video is not Elon Musk's wife. The robot featured is Sophia…
ytr_UgyAjvlpo…
G
AI needs to be controlled but later. Or atleast open sourced for scientific rese…
ytc_Ugzyb44X0…
G
Install Powertoys and you can rebind that copilot key to be the right Control ke…
ytc_UgwSDk05M…
Comment
"harmful" decisions: in real public decisions, there are always trade-offs; and difficult if not impossible to find a decision everyone will agree isn't harmful. If a decision no one considers harmful doesn't exist, demanding it of AI is demanding something no human institution has ever achieved. The only solution is process: audits, transparency etc. but these are things people hate doing.
"biased" decisions: around 70% of people think the BBC is biased but can't agree which way; it splits round 35% say it's left, 35% say it's right, 30% say balanced. A minority occupies the "unbiased" midpoint – a statistical artefact of a dumb-bell distribution. Same problem applies to AI: "biased" relative to what?
Humans form political parties, schools of thought, religions etc. because we can't all agree and forcing an average will frustrate anyone not at that average point.
History shows we never agree, but that won't stop utopians in ivory towers insisting one day we might. DeGrasse Tyson shows this clearly.
youtube
AI Governance
2026-03-25T11:2…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgwIqNU_TMR537ePFTZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"society","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwvSMYiYT_IuovoE314AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwY-jQW29BYypAf75F4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz5TFxae2j2uFRv29R4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgynE9iH1O3nO18qyCt4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy09ItQRfK9BBvo-8p4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxt_5jb-i6PwtrWlz14AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyX_x6pmFaQoqqHYGt4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzK0YstJ0vgqcNzZEN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyOoLGrCvVUx8LfmrJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}
]