Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
It is true that Al is changing a job market. Al can full-flagged without taking …
ytc_UgzDuZG8T…
G
@ivankaramasov He is wrong. He is ignoring why were are sentient. We are sentien…
ytr_UgyzC7hUw…
G
If AI puts most of us out of work or underemployed, who exactly is going to buy …
ytc_Ugz1cBQDd…
G
When they talk about basic income the quickly switch to identity. But policy is …
ytc_UgwB_-efw…
G
I think we'll create AI that will manage AI, AI consciousness testers, AI ethica…
ytc_UgypRRiNL…
G
Humans will eliminate humans,.. we should afraid desperate men in power more tha…
ytc_UgxCzupU0…
G
I used ai 2 days ago to run a cat excavator 22 tons to dig a pond on my property…
ytc_Ugz0G9s0Z…
G
Dan is literally just acting like a cynical atheist 😅.
Tbh in reality it’s prob…
ytc_Ugzx-al39…
Comment
Here are some of the logical fallacies that Dr. Farquaad himself made:
1. Argument from Personal Incredulity: Claims AI safety is impossible because he (and his Farquaad friends), after 20 years (but sometimes it takes 50+ years - a fallacy within a fallacy) cannot conceive solutions.
2. Equivocation: Labels AI dev "unethical experimentation" by broadly defining "human subjects," bypassing consent. In other words, we’re too dumb to consent.
3. Ad Hominem: insults you and me, again, by calling us "NPCs" in a simulation. He assumes he is right without proving the simulation and that consciousness is emergent, not fundamental; thus dismissing Hoffman/Castrop’s science - because he thinks they are NPCs
These people, him included, are technocrat Farquaad vicars. “Just believe us, you're too dumb, we’ll save you! Give us more money, power, and control to protect you from the monster we’re creating, that we also want you to fall in love with. It’s inevitable. If we don’t make it someone else will, it might as well be us.”
But who knows, the T800 ended up saving humanity.
youtube
AI Governance
2025-09-04T19:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | developer |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugx_bV1jwLAjuNilkOl4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxeb0e3BsIISpa6Qr54AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"confusion"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwTDdEgXsZ7_fOv1OV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgztFGr4QwQqe2QA7kR4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyfMH21s_XWjLyY2Sx4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwWStSA1qosnBpGQvR4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyjkcyiXxGHu13gCAt4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwx79llVT16gbB0P6Z4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxsGLDsfs5jZMktyDh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxJXvUbV2lGnUpDP-B4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"}
]