Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G Big Tech isn't in charge of AI technology. There are open source models out ther… ytc_Ugz3XruBc… G Forgot Nobel, The DAWG prize for AI achievements. Set in a parallel. At the pac… ytc_UgzzelFG3… G Layoffs are still wild especially in software engineering. As AI advances and co… ytr_Ugwz8GfTo… G When it gets to the point where people deepfake someone killing someone. Or some… ytc_UgziF_G5f… G his points would only make sense if he made his own AI and trains it ONLY using … ytc_Ugy1bUPXQ… G Thank you for commenting, @user-dv2zb1de6ename! Looks like Robotky Balboa gave u… ytr_UgwZcJmP3… G Whenever i watches this type of video it reminds me the masterpiece movie "I Rob… ytc_Ugw0yVTAn… G Hi Roy, you got the right answer. Kudos. The contest is over and winners have be… ytr_UgzwuURLI…

Comment

I have thought about Artificial Intelligence, and the only issue I see with AI is copyrights. Someone used AI to create a picture and tried to copyright or get a patent on it, claiming the author was AI. The patent office refused (good call) and said they had to use the owner's name. But that is just for now; what if they sue in court and get it ruled the other way? I think it would be constitutional and necessary to add one item to the US Public Law on Copyrights. Please just add a definition to the word "authors" to say that "author" is to be defined as human. You must be human to copyright something (even if created by a computer). That way, any output from AI (image, picture, song, voice, science, math) cannot be copyrighted; only a human can copyright the output, thus the copyright would apply to a person. Copyright law (Title 17, U.S.C.) does not define the word "author," so just define it as human. The solution is to update the copyright laws to define "author" as human only. That is the fix.

youtube 2026-01-26T15:4…

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	government
Reasoning	deontological
Policy	liability
Emotion	fear
Coded at	2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytc_UgyWzT12xg_qGpsSmWd4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyKOBoil55AuXwK8rR4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzFboJu57rPVIuQEBR4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwUwsb9c2oj0ZM4n1h4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw1hMmNuf5tMAypDGB4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"liability","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwGh7pN4tj6WRuh2RB4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwQPLKagYVoUZMGF6x4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyxXajnFzIcytuYTmt4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyjPRaUGC8Bku-ODSl4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx0yZ1hUB-w6dPHSdV4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}
]

Raw LLM Responses