Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G it's not automatically assuming. if a company is hiring people based on color , … ytr_UgwhabjBB… G If we've been replaced by AI, the companies won't need us anymore, not as employ… ytc_UgxWsSGFZ… G It’s our use of AI wouldn’t be able to be turned off or pulled back. That’s the … ytc_UgwdcIRfA… G I have to admit that they developed an incredible technology. Also, this is not … ytc_UgzcMHXSj… G Whether by Neural Lacing or other means AI ChatBot can create the illusion of… ytc_UgwOQlpmX… G Is Krystal saying we should abandon AI development? mWhat is her plan to persuad… ytc_UgxaOn6hZ… G Okay Sis, first off thank you for doing all you do. I keep hearing this phrase “… ytc_UgwthIqXy… G I don't think we will ever reach a point where fully working solutions are outpu… ytc_Ugwn6SdgH…

Comment

I have thought about Artificial Intelligence, and the only issue I see with AI is copyrights. Someone used AI to create a picture and tried to copyright or get a patent on it, claiming the author was AI. The patent office refused (good call) and said they had to use the owner's name. But that is just for now; what if they sue in court and get it ruled the other way? I think it would be constitutional and necessary to add one item to the US Public Law on Copyrights. Please just add a definition to the word "authors" to say that "author" is to be defined as human. You must be human to copyright something (even if created by a computer). That way, any output from AI (image, picture, song, voice, science, math) cannot be copyrighted; only a human can copyright the output, thus the copyright would apply to a person. Copyright law (Title 17, U.S.C.) does not define the word "author," so just define it as human. The solution is to update the copyright laws to define "author" as human only. That is the fix.

youtube 2026-01-26T15:4…

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	government
Reasoning	deontological
Policy	liability
Emotion	fear
Coded at	2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytc_UgyWzT12xg_qGpsSmWd4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyKOBoil55AuXwK8rR4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzFboJu57rPVIuQEBR4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwUwsb9c2oj0ZM4n1h4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw1hMmNuf5tMAypDGB4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"liability","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwGh7pN4tj6WRuh2RB4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwQPLKagYVoUZMGF6x4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyxXajnFzIcytuYTmt4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyjPRaUGC8Bku-ODSl4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx0yZ1hUB-w6dPHSdV4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}
]

Raw LLM Responses