Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G I'm glad it's backfiring. They were trying to get AI to replace actual workers t… ytc_Ugyc-vAU4… G Well I saw some videos on YouTube.usually there is an expirienced coder letting … rdc_jabrlxq G Summary of the Current Aurarium State Architectural Synthesis Aurarium is not … ytc_Ugwzkjfjb… G I feel Ai isn't dangerous but it will replace humans as the lowest standing to t… ytc_UgzV08ng7… G Why would an AI robot type on a keyboard instead of just plugging into a USB por… ytr_UgxeLuVKy… G @radscorpion8 It's not unreasonable to imagine that a super-intelligent system c… ytr_UgzP9Sr_d… G I’m the BSA for a prosecuting attorney and I’m in the process of designing AI th… ytc_Ugz0LQdHB… G Yes that's also true. What I meant by my original post is that any person who do… rdc_nmghbxa

Comment

The company that offers the self-driving software should always be at fault in these instances. It should be a standardized process where the victim of a crash resulting from a self-driving car gets the amount their model of car goes for new or an equivalent amount if discontinued, no extra money if no injury occurred, hospital bills and therapy if injury does occur, and a LOT of money awarded to the victim's family in the case of death. Perhaps play or argue with the values, but it should never be up for interpretation in any instance, to protect the companies of self-driving cars from getting ransacked by lawyers, while providing a service for people who want self-driving features, while being fair to those who suffer from self-driving car accidents. Self-driving cars are a LOT better than real drivers, but don't ever expect them to be perfect 100% of the time. To demand that they be extorted by lawyers and provide million-dollar payouts for fenderbenders is ridiculous, but they should still be held responsible in a fair and calculated manner.

youtube AI Harm Incident 2024-02-10T19:2… ♥ 1

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	company
Reasoning	consequentialist
Policy	liability
Emotion	indifference
Coded at	2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytc_UgzsMny5GTzxf_qA-Kt4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwa7ktSbWZedD4pbeB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzit5WCyetFhXsCdnF4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx_J0VTCsOLrLdoPKZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyiK2ldfsbbanayE-t4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwFewy4zmRx7LITYUx4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyESKb8N9zOA3qGg3d4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugys5AhLDoxDMXL-eGB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgynAwro4P6JwUl-qLN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwA_7SdgUL1Vwk7hEx4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}
]

Raw LLM Responses