Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G Everything digital will boil down to a battle of who has the fastest, smartest A… rdc_mi7m68v G Ai is more advanced than any of us would like to admit, yall dumass would see in… ytc_Ugyfpt07o… G I dont think AI will ever be able to capture human emotion in the voice… ytc_UgzZ0Uxjb… G Fake, show me how u set this up. AI and things like that wouldn't use the word "… ytc_Ugz_F87oj… G Where we are with AI compared to AI becoming self aware, we’re just barely scrat… ytc_Ugz3gTpoo… G This is assuming AI will bring bigger profits. When the opposite is more likely … ytc_UgzWGHOWq… G The second step is to censor AI tools and information from the internet with sev… ytc_Ugy0uduG2… G Why are u even calling them Artists? you wouldn't call someone who used chat got… ytc_UgyZPnMX9…

Comment

The company that offers the self-driving software should always be at fault in these instances. It should be a standardized process where the victim of a crash resulting from a self-driving car gets the amount their model of car goes for new or an equivalent amount if discontinued, no extra money if no injury occurred, hospital bills and therapy if injury does occur, and a LOT of money awarded to the victim's family in the case of death. Perhaps play or argue with the values, but it should never be up for interpretation in any instance, to protect the companies of self-driving cars from getting ransacked by lawyers, while providing a service for people who want self-driving features, while being fair to those who suffer from self-driving car accidents. Self-driving cars are a LOT better than real drivers, but don't ever expect them to be perfect 100% of the time. To demand that they be extorted by lawyers and provide million-dollar payouts for fenderbenders is ridiculous, but they should still be held responsible in a fair and calculated manner.

youtube AI Harm Incident 2024-02-10T19:2… ♥ 1

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	company
Reasoning	consequentialist
Policy	liability
Emotion	indifference
Coded at	2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytc_UgzsMny5GTzxf_qA-Kt4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwa7ktSbWZedD4pbeB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzit5WCyetFhXsCdnF4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx_J0VTCsOLrLdoPKZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyiK2ldfsbbanayE-t4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwFewy4zmRx7LITYUx4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyESKb8N9zOA3qGg3d4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugys5AhLDoxDMXL-eGB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgynAwro4P6JwUl-qLN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwA_7SdgUL1Vwk7hEx4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}
]

Raw LLM Responses