Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Wow they are so behind. Claude code? Nerfed to the oblivion now. Anyone not usin…
rdc_oi004vl
G
"To avoid human mistakes military decisions will be made by ai" oh that sounds …
ytc_Ugw4Jsyzt…
G
its funny that a guy that is pretty smart in many ways only gets his news from l…
ytc_UgwrPsZ9h…
G
AI """""artist""""""" trying to draw is just them writing "A-anime girl with big…
ytc_UgwJoQnC5…
G
We appreciate your thoughts on AI, but it's essential to remember that AI serves…
ytr_UgwFZOjpM…
G
Jon, get Ed Zitron on the show if you want to have a better picture of the state…
ytc_UgzP_FFDq…
G
Same feeling with coding. My sister was sometimes asking if I could write a piec…
ytc_UgxzliATQ…
G
When you ask AI for health advice the brain damage must have been there before.…
ytc_UgxA3uRVY…
Comment
I thought the techbros who think LLMs are sentient and deserve human rights are just plain stupid and mentally ill, but then came the very fart-huffing "robots can never have human rights or be slaves, because check out my Ben Shapiro tier Burger King philosophy pamphlet word game" counter and it beat the techbro loser in loserdom.
Obviously robots can warrant human rights, if in future there are actually sentient and sapient electronic minds then the one moral choice is for them to be treated like other people. It's very ironic how the parody of an SJW is unironically doing the racism thing - excluding a group not by any actually scientific or logically sound qualifier, but through a false dichotomy and a sophist word game. We don't actually give human rights to things that are human - zygotes and skin cells are human - we give them to persons, which is why pets have rights in between people and all other animals we as a society don't find personable at all.
youtube
2025-09-17T20:0…
♥ 1
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | unclear |
| Reasoning | mixed |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgzYFPLZodK9eGN8Xp14AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgywirgPK6RTYH3V9dx4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzfNAMd6SX6jGPFPIl4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxKNq12hF9B-IIZQpJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwWigB5N1wseWtLp0l4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyVO_4jQT1LTUUVPep4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgygN7pR-EGBIi_kd5h4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxaNtoZk9evzHkxsox4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxof8G_E0jqdcP3WOF4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyWueEel3xgxMl-SKR4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"}
]