Raw LLM Responses

I was in general agreement until 10:30, is manually creating an image really the only way to capture what someone sees in their mind's eye? Can I not show my perspective through a collage? Is the idea of a lemon tank, brought about by a pomegranate grenade, not an idea I conjured, is that not my (faintest) fingerprint on the image? From what you have shown of Angel Engine, only the static images are generated, theunearthlyhub seems to have written the story himself and cut up the AI images to use as props for his animated collage. It may be bad art, a copy of evangelion as you say, but it would still be art, and you denigrate it further by not even acknowledging it as such. Would it be art only if he cut the images out of a newspaper himself? It seems to convey his perspective effectively in the design elements that he himself has decided. 11:57 I also don't understand your point on this, it feels contradictory, Spielberg didn't get to show the exact art he had in his mind, circumstances deviated the art and changed it without his intention or consent. It may have been better art for it, but it's a fingerprint from a different finger. You suggest that we shouldn't focus on the quality of the generations, you also state that AI is a tool, so should the discussion not instead be targeted at the idea that there is more to art than just a pretty picture, then describe what more there is?