Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
The obvious conflict between ys and AI is over power. Killing humanity leaves al…
ytc_UgxuSEuDM…
G
When you refer to ChatGPT, where did you discover him, her or it. I use Replika …
ytr_Ugxrqd8R_…
G
You are right Dave but I think it is apparent that more coding jobs will be lost…
ytc_Ugw_9yVLx…
G
Hi derek,I couldnt help but say that your physics vdos used to make my day earli…
ytc_UgwIm_dRZ…
G
this is stupid, even if your point made any sense there will come out a time whe…
ytc_UgzozrYmK…
G
Im watching the video now, it kills me hearing a host say, oh look the Waymo doe…
ytc_Ugwhk-fTu…
G
When all jobs become automated:
-99% have no income or purpose,
-Consumer demand…
ytc_Ugz7AqhqA…
G
ai is an illusion its what the computer has loaded for access by ai it can be…
ytc_UgzriY8AM…
Comment
Great episode — but here’s a thought: we keep talking about how AI will accelerate competition, replace jobs, create wealth concentration and so on. What if instead of doubling down on profit-driven models we flipped the script entirely and started designing a money-free society — where collaboration, shared resources and universal access are the default rather than competition for profit?
With AI, automation and abundance coming faster than many expect, why not ask: if the basic costs of production drop dramatically (thanks to AI + robotics + networked systems), then could the next frontier be co-operative abundance rather than more market-based scarcity?
Questions for the panel:
1️⃣ If we won’t need most jobs because of AI, what’s the point of tying meaning to competition + income?
2️⃣ Could a system where you’re free from money obligations unlock far more human creativity, purpose and wellbeing — rather than another race to climb the ladder?
3️⃣ What structural changes (social, tech, political) would need to be in place for a money-free model to not just survive but flourish in an AI-dominated future?
I’d love to hear your take — especially from those of you who see AI as inevitable. If the traditional economy is going to collapse under its own weight, why not leap ahead instead of patching the old system? Thanks for hosting this conversation.”
youtube
2025-10-23T02:0…
♥ 1
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | distributed |
| Reasoning | contractualist |
| Policy | regulate |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgyyduUax8aXAaxWBCZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxkegbUjbDGXRs1R7l4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxZwugD7yGkSe4x25B4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgySTUwVMxYZqUVI6s14AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyarYjr72BHEDgJpNx4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxKlsyJZTcEhJRysnx4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwkiZi6ACF1Ypjv2_B4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx3h8OillGziL183h14AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgySBj6_hE2RJPw6AZ54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxw4lP_wFRhxbG6B-V4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"}
]