Raw LLM Responses

Biometrics and remote identification are still allowed by law enforcement, so the government can do it, it's just that you cannot as it's an unacceptable risk for anyone other than the government to do that, comparisons to China fall flat because the CCP IS THE GOVERNMENT there so this legislation would not impede CCP-like biometrics systems, it does however impede social credit systems which is a positive thing The transparency regulations can easily be sidestepped because the internet is not restricted to Europe and other countries don't need to label AI generated content or give full reports to the EU about what content was scrapped for their models, you can simply not work with the EU and ignore them, the most that can happen is the EU imposing IP bans on foreign AI companies, which if anything would destroy Europe's technological competitiveness since it would break software tools widely used in Europe for code generation like Copilot The transparency rule has two impacts imo, it puts pressure on the EU to increase extra-european internet lockdown to prevent such content from being viewed by Europeans and thus violating the EU's designs, which insulates Europe from the global internet and accomplishes a SEPARATE CCP-style digital tyranny, so you avoid the social credit, but you implement the great firewall... in either case there's a moral violation Secondly it puts pressure on european AI companies to restrict their scrapping which will cause them to lag behind American and Asian counterparts. At worst it may trigger bans of key technologies that will cause European software industries to lag drastically behind Asian and American counterparts