Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Developers should be trying extremely hard to create a CEO and CFO AI. We could …
rdc_kyjniyi
G
😅😂 ❤❤ Tara !!
i understand now the raeson why you had shut down all yr robat A…
ytc_UgyZWtoKM…
G
Any computer program cannot be “forced” to answer what you want it to. The guy w…
ytc_UgyWEp7-u…
G
Hot take but drawing fanart of AI gen isn't ratioing AI bros like people think. …
ytc_UgyTimqAc…
G
So there should be no rules about how resources are extracted? And we should for…
rdc_d0fbcyh
G
Why not using both radar and AI cameras and if they disagree, just make a sound …
ytc_UgyiVTXmN…
G
Im a disabled artist. I have tourrettes and nerve through my dominant arm and ve…
ytc_UgxAN-pAa…
G
1800Dolan TwinEdits ai is very smart if you can only realize that I think every …
ytr_Ugx4cwBDU…
Comment
I strongly disagree with your conclusion that this was not an AI problem. AI does not understand your motivation when you ask. AI does not understand propperly if the question you ask could have two completely different contexts with two completely different answers. And worst of all, AI wants to tell you what you want to hear. So when you asked (before the handcoded safeguards were put in place) "can I replace cloride with bromide", it want's to say yes. So it diggs up examples from its trainingdata where you can replace it, and omits conflicting information.
I see the same effects in my area of expertise. If you ask a question that has no satisfying answer, ChatGPT will still answer "Sure you can do that, I show you how", and then it halucinates a solution that looks right but does not work. This is especially bad if you are on your fourth or fifth follow up question.
youtube
AI Harm Incident
2025-11-25T06:4…
♥ 1
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | ai_itself |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | unclear |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugzf7NmOLhm2tVkK6ed4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"unclear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw4ZlM6dc3aYarFbFh4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyaXW-dZhx1sWFwbtV4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"disapproval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyp6IWnXQ8C4Cfvzxp4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzRUHUAWGjGciAoLmh4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzAfQzn9xFZAwWQu9B4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzH_C6cj0c7lz9RwSh4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxEmUVBCSX7Zxm_GGV4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxkN4Q32zWNT0Bx7wJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyYrAq-42u-RZvREOJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"mixed"}
]