Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
"You scared to say your opinion" what a moronic thing to say to an AI XDDDD…
ytc_UgwOr-1WT…
G
For me, the big problem with AI or at lest the way its implemented is that it ne…
ytc_UgxL3xftZ…
G
what if we all were in our own open ai art with ppl in the future watching us 😰…
ytc_UgxCtLOG_…
G
@gyperman3751 so why should we care about you? You oviously don't care if our jo…
ytr_Ugy2xbJi_…
G
It's supposed to be "the ocean had other edicts", but A.I. screwed that one up. …
ytr_Ugwfefp26…
G
AI tech bros are essentially gamblers if you think about it. They constantly try…
ytc_UgwinlIQk…
G
Funnily enough, I got an ai ad before the video. Thankfully, it was skippable an…
ytc_Ugy9ICOHn…
G
Deep fake is deep trouble but why government allowing this so called ai technolo…
ytc_UgyJul70h…
Comment
For this theory to be correct, however, companies would have to continually want at least 35% more features/code in their codebase (since the avg. developer using AI is 35% more productive), for an infinite amount of time. That is quite possibly one of the most ridiculous arguments I've ever heard, as much as I would like to believe it. The fact is, if the average developer is 35% more productive, and at some point companies don't need 35% more features/code, then the logical conclusion is that they will need 35% less workers on their software dev team. For a company that has 10 devs, that's not TOO big of a deal, that's 3.5 people gone from that company. But for a company with 1000 devs, that's 350 people gone; 10,000 devs, 3,500 people gone. Then multiply those numbers by all the total devs in the world. It means 35% less workers (globally) in the software development space. It is estimated that there are roughly 30 million professional developers, globally. 35% of 30 million = 10.5 million people. It may not happen all at once, but that is (over time) a whole lot of people without jobs. For the sake of my own optimism, I hope someone can come up with an intelligent rebuttal...
youtube
AI Jobs
2025-12-24T21:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgwL_9Gsl9OFYjpiNEZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgymH4Qn2mvOUffZgOR4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzv8RcvzHmnjFBUlLt4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzrAuAg2j0ZSajVlXt4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwdy3-2hkTUzYJzNjB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzRLAGiat1C5fBQAHR4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzs3--T3oB5JC6ci3V4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyS4C6cYWQUJdY5WnN4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy1FqkBqCD2vhz1-V94AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyiQMKFV1VVaKQjJRd4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"}
]